Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Thibodeaux v. Burton, 538 So. 2d 1001.
-
Balakrishnan v. Louisiana State University
939 So. 2d 595
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
Blue Bonnet Creamery, Inc. v. Simon, 243 La.
-
McNab v. Blanton
927 So. 2d 1281
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
(La.1989); Hickman v. Wm.
-
Trejos v. Greater Lakeside Corp.
921 So. 2d 1037
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
(citations omitted); Arias v. State Farm Mut.
- Cunningham v. M & S MARINE, INC. 923 So. 2d 770 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
- Z.U. Azhar Clinic v. Rafiq 913 So. 2d 135 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
-
New Orleans Business & Industrial District v. AW24 Corp.
898 So. 2d 521
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
the Louisiana Supreme Court set forth the following requirements for obtaining a default judgment: |fiIn order for a plaintiff to obtain a default judgment, “he must establish the elements of a prima facie case with competent evidence, as fully as though each of the allegations in the petition were denied by the defendant.” Blue Bonnet Creamery, Inc. v. Simon, 243 La.
-
Crescent City Const., Inc. v. Camper
898 So. 2d 408
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Bordelon v. Sayer, 01-0717 (La.App.
-
Judy Barton v. Cicero and Earline Hines
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
“A party who seeks to have a default judgment set aside must allege and prove good reasons for nonappearance and failure to timely plea.”2 Jurisprudence does not delineate the exact boundaries for what constitutes “good reasons.” 1 (citations omitted).
-
Barton v. Hines
884 So. 2d 1214
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
NOTES [1] (citations omitted).
-
Carter v. Amite City Ford, Inc.
885 So. 2d 1190
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
art. 1702(A); Sessions &
- Gresham v. Production Management, Inc. 868 So. 2d 171 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
- Champagne v. Manuel 864 So. 2d 797 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
-
Champagne v. Wilson
864 So. 2d 800
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
5 Cir. 2/14/01) , ; writ denied 2001-1035 (La.6/1/01)
-
Ventola v. Hall
861 So. 2d 677
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
5 Cir. 2/14/01) , ; writ denied XXXX-XXXX (La.6/1/01)
-
Richardson v. Lott
868 So. 2d 64
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
1004 n. 1 (La.1989); Cavalier v. Louisiana Farm Bur.
- Hall v. Folger Coffee Co. 857 So. 2d 1234 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
- Mossy Motors, Inc. v. Cameras America 851 So. 2d 336 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
-
Clark v. Clarendon Ins. Co.
841 So. 2d 1039
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
Standard of Review "In order for a plaintiff to obtain a default judgment, `he must establish the elements of a prima facie case with competent evidence, as fully as though each of the allegations in the petition were denied by defendant.'" Sessions &
- Conerly v. Jefferson 820 So. 2d 1173 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
- Crump v. Bank One Corp. 817 So. 2d 1187 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
- Hayes v. Taylor 812 So. 2d 874 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
-
R & R Steel Erectors v. Watson
809 So. 2d 1228
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Liquid Air Corp., the supreme court explained the prima facie requirement with respect to a default judgment as follows: In order for a plaintiff to obtain a default judgment, “he must establish the elements of a prima facie case with competent evidence, as fully as though each of the allegations in the petition were denied by the defendant.” Blue Bonnet Creamery, Inc. v. Simon, 243 La.
-
Bates v. Legion Indem. Co.
818 So. 2d 176
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
P. art. 1702(A); Rhodes v. All Star Ford, Inc., (La.App.
-
Martin v. Sanders
805 So. 2d 1209
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
Sessions & Fishman v. Liquid Air Corp., *1212
- Smith v. Clement 797 So. 2d 151 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
- Stewart v. Edwards 784 So. 2d 740 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
-
Schaff v. Cardinal Services, Inc.
778 So. 2d 1278
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
(citations omitted); *1281 Arias v. State Farm Mut.
-
Davis v. Coregis Ins. Co.
789 So. 2d 7
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
Ereunao Oil & Gas, Inc. v. Northern, 98-1239 (La.
- Caruso v. McBee 767 So. 2d 134 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
-
Louisiana Pacific Corp. v. Hyatt
758 So. 2d 295
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
preme Court discussed the requirements for attaining a judgment of default in Sessions & : In order for a plaintiff to obtain a default judgment, “he must establish the elements of a prima facie case with competent evidence, as fully as though each of the allegations in the petition were denied by the defendant.” Blue Bonnet Creamery, Inc. v. Simon, 243 La.
- Arias v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. 734 So. 2d 730 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
-
Ereunao Oil & Gas, Inc. v. Northern
736 So. 2d 893
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
However, the supreme court noted that the defendant "failed to timely answer the petition and has presented no reasonable excuse for its failure."
- Hedderel v. Merrick 715 So. 2d 609 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
-
Washington v. GRAND CASINOS OF LA., INC.
715 So. 2d 515
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
Blue Bonnet Creamery, Inc. v. Simon, 243 La.
-
Brasseaux v. Allstate Ins. Co.
710 So. 2d 826
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
art. 1702(A); Rhodes v. All Star Ford, Inc., (La.App.
- VSA, Inc. v. Catalanotto 708 So. 2d 1090 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
- Gleason v. Palmieri 707 So. 2d 57 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
- McGowan v. Warwick Corp. 691 So. 2d 265 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
-
Thibodeaux v. C.W. & W. Contractors
685 So. 2d 461
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
eme court, in the oft cited case of Sessions & interpreted these articles, holding that: In order for a plaintiff to obtain a default judgment, “he must establish the elements of a prima facie case with competent evidence, as fully as though each of the allegations in the petition were denied by the defendant.” Blue Bonnet Creamery, Inc. v. Simon, 243 La.
-
Skrantz v. Smith
685 So. 2d 492
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
court, in the often cited case of Sessions & interpreted these articles, holding that: lain order for a plaintiff to obtain a default judgment, “he must establish the elements of a prima facie case with competent evidence, as fully as though each of the allegations in the petition were denied by the defendant.” Blue Bonnet Creamery, Inc. v. Simon, 243 La.
-
Orleans Sheet Metal Works v. Landis Co.
678 So. 2d 73
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
Sessions & Fishman, 616 So.2d at 1258
- Akerman v. Dawes 658 So. 2d 1270 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
- Calhoun v. Deslattes 648 So. 2d 993 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
- Palombo v. Palombo 643 So. 2d 445 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
-
Band v. First Bankcard Center
644 So. 2d 211
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
Blue Bonnet Creamery, Inc. v. Simon, 243 La.
- Futch v. Commercial Union Ins. Co. 625 So. 2d 1019 La. 1994
-
Joseph v. Joseph
619 So. 2d 181
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
3 Cir.1989) as follows: reversing the denial of a new trial following a default judgment, tells us that we must be "especially careful" and "particularly cautious" when reviewing denials of a new trial in cases of default judgments.
-
Sessions & Fishman v. Liquid Air Corp.
616 So. 2d 1254
La. 1993
Blue Bonnet Creamery, Inc. v. Simon, 243 La.
- Mosley v. Dairyland Ins. Co. 614 So. 2d 792 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
- Melendreras v. Blanchard 598 So. 2d 1226 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992