Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Starns v. Emmons, 538 So. 2d 275.

81 citing documents.

Diamond Services Corporation v. Cobbs, Allen, & Hall of Louisiana, Inc.; Dual Corporate Risks, Ltd.; Lloyd's Syndicate NVA … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
C. C. art. 3494( 4); - 78 ( La.
Lawrence Steven Mopsik v. Kristina Angelina Galjour La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
Chantel Edwards v. U.S. Property and Casualty Airbnb, Crawford and Company Chateau Management LLC. La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
Octavio Diaz-molina v. Walter C. Flower, III La. 2023
Pedestal Bank v. Castaways Oyster Bar & Seafood Grill, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
Moreover, “[a]n admission in a pleading constitutes a judicial confession and is full proof against the party making it.”
State of Louisiana, Division of Administration, Office of Community Developement - Disaster Recovery Unit v. Deborah Bagert A/K/A … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
State of Louisiana, Ex Rel. Justin Dale Tureau v. BEPCO, L.P., BOPCO, L.P., Chevron U.S.A., Inc., Chisolm Trail … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
Anthony J. Gaspard, Et Ux v. Camping World Rv Sales, L.L.C. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
App. 4 Cir. 9/4/02), ( (La.
Bottinelli Real Estate, L.L.C. v. Johns Manville, Inc. and Roof Technologies, Inc. La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2019
App. 4 Cir. 9/4/02), ( (La.
Fluid Disposal Specialties, Inc. v. UniFirst Corporation La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
Dept. of Social Services, 02–0831, p. 7 (La.12/4/02), Qayyum v. Morehouse General Hospital, 38,530 (La.App.
Wendell G. Russ v. City of New Orleans, New Orleans Police Department, and Lieutenant Aldrich in Her Capacity … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2019
Court acknowledged that “all actions covered by article 3494 are grounded in contractual relationships,” 1993-2715, p. 3, 638 So.2d at 647, and that “‘[a]rticle 3494 does not present a choice between a contract remedy and some other remedy; it merely provides exceptions to the general rule stated in article 3499 that a personal action prescribes in ten years.’” Id., (La.
Leblanc v. Thibodeaux 256 So. 3d 1071 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Starns v. Emmons , , 277 (La.1989).
Randy Leblanc v. Fred Alan Thibodeaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
Dephillips v. Hosp. Serv. Dist. No. 1 of Tangipahoa Parish 255 So. 3d 34 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Coleman v. Querbes Co. No. 1 218 So. 3d 665 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
Bezou v. Bezou 203 So. 3d 488 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Hotard's Plumbing, Electrical, Heating & Air, Inc. v. Monarch Homes, LLC 188 So. 3d 391 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
art. 3494 “constitutes a legislative limitation on the remedies available to a plaintiff who brings certain enumerated personal actions more than three years after the cause of action arose.”
Dean Born v. City of Slidell 180 So. 3d 1227 La. 2015
through Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, 04-C-2482 (La.4/12/05)
Yesterdays of Lake Charles, Inc. v. Calcasieu Parish Sales and Use Tax Department La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Taboni v. Estate of Longo, 01-2107 (La.2/22/02)
McClellan v. Premier Nissan, L.L.C. 167 So. 3d 934 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
In this case, the only date alleged in the plaintiffs’ petition is August 19, 2005, at which time the plaintiffs assert that they “entered into a Simple Interest Retail Installment Contact (“Sales Agreement”) with defendant for the purchase of a 2004 Nissan Armada.” the Supreme Court noted: The character of an action disclosed in the pleadings determines the prescriptive period applicable to that action.
Minor v. Monroe Surgical Hospital, LLC 154 So. 3d 665 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
The prescriptive period for the instant consolidated suits for the recovery of underpaid wages is otherwise provided for in | Barticle 3494, for that article, as earlier indicated, provides a three year prescriptive period for personal actions seeking “compensation for services rendered.” (La.
Monroe v. Physicians Behavioral Hospital, LLC 147 So. 3d 787 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
Brumberger v. Cvitanovich 140 So. 3d 118 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
The Louisiana SuPreme Court has held that the three-year prescriptive period under Article 3493 is an authorized legislative limitation on the remedies available to a plaintiff who brings certain enumerated personal actions
Eastern Solutions, Inc. v. Naji Al-Fouzan La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
However, La.Civ.Code art. 3494 “constitutes a legislative limitation on the remedies available to a plaintiff who brings certain enumerated personal actions more than three years after the cause of action arose.”
Eastern Solutions, Inc. v. Al-Fouzan 103 So. 3d 1190 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
However, La.Civ.Code art. 3494 “constitutes a legislative limitation on the remedies available to a plaintiff who brings certain enumerated personal actions more than three years after the cause of action arose.”
Sitaram, Inc. v. Bryan Insurance Agency, Inc. 104 So. 3d 524 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
Johnson v. Ledoux, 42,090 (La.App.2d Cir.5/16/07), , writ denied, 2007-1482 (La.10/5/07), .
Good Hope Baptist Church v. Ict Insurance Agency, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Good Hope Baptist Church v. ICT Insurance Agency, Inc. 41 So. 3d 1229 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Touro Infirmary v. American Maritime Officer 34 So. 3d 878 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
9:2781 D. “In determining the applicable prescriptive period, we are guided by the well-settled principle that ‘[t]he character of an action disclosed in the pleadings determines the prescriptive period applicable to that action.’ (collecting cases).” Parry v. The Administrators of the Tulane Educational Fund, 02-0382, p. 7 (La.App.
First Louisiana Bank v. MORRIS & DICKSON, CO. 6 So. 3d 1047 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
Johnson v. Ledoux, 42,090 (La.App.2d Cir.5/16/07), , writ denied, 07-1482 (La.10/5/07)
RAMELLI GROUP v. City of New Orleans 997 So. 2d 612 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
Id., 2004-2482 p, 6, 898 So.2d at 1265
Omega Pain Mgmt. v. Omega Inst. of Health 975 So. 2d 48 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
Johnson v. LEDEOUX 957 So. 2d 911 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
Raborn v. Gulf States Pipeline Corp. 954 So. 2d 353 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
Wonycott v. Southern Business Machines, Inc., (La.App.
Finova Capital Corp. v. Denmon's Louisiana Pharmacy, Inc. 908 So. 2d 1210 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
Finova Capital Corp. v. SHORT'S PHARMACY 904 So. 2d 57 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
Fishbein v. STATE EX REL. LSU 898 So. 2d 1260 La. 2005
Fishbein v. State ex rel. Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center 898 So. 2d 1260 La. 2005
Joshua Terrell, Indiv. Etc. v. Town of Merryville La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Taboni v. Estate of Longo, 01- 2107 (La.2/22/02)
Fishbein v. STATE EX REL. LSU 887 So. 2d 56 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Scott v. Sears, Roebuck and Co., XXXX-XXXX, p. 4 (La.App.
Fishbein v. State ex rel. Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center 887 So. 2d 56 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Scott v. Sears, Roebuck and Co., 1999-0571, p. 4 (La.App.
CT Traina, Inc. v. Sunshine Plaza, Inc. 861 So. 2d 156 La. 2003
Taboni v. Estate of Longo, 01-2107 (La.2/22/02)
Ss v. State Ex Rel. Dept. of Social Servic. 831 So. 2d 926 La. 2002
Kaigler v. Oestreicher 833 So. 2d 479 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Parry v. Administrators of the Tulane Educational Fund 828 So. 2d 30 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
|7In determining the applicable prescriptive period, we are guided by the well-settled principle that “[t]he character of an action disclosed in the pleadings determines the prescriptive period applicable to that action.” (collecting cases).
Peneguy v. Porteous 823 So. 2d 380 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
TABONI v. Estate of Longo 810 So. 2d 1142 La. 2002
Krolick v. State ex rel. Department of Health & Human Resources 790 So. 2d 21 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Krolick v. STATE THROUGH DEPT. OF HRS 790 So. 2d 21 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Boutte v. Jefferson Parish Hosp. Serv. 759 So. 2d 45 La. 2000