Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Kimble v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 539 So. 2d 1212.

23 citing documents.

Sandra Parnell Versus Kai Nealey and Citi Trends, Inc. La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
“When a customer proves that a foreign substance or object on a store’s floor presented an unreasonable risk of injury which caused a damaging fall, the store must exculpate itself from a presumption of negligence.” Kimble v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., (La.
Matherne v. Lorraine 888 So. 2d 244 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
3 Cir.1988), aff'd in part, amended in part, once the presumption of negligence attaches to the defendant, the ordinary rules of comparative negligence apply and, thus, a plaintiff's damage award may be reduced by the degree that he was comparatively at fault.
Bassett v. Toys" R" US Delaware, Inc. 836 So. 2d 465 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
As set forth by the supreme court in Kimble v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., (La.
Lofton v. Hayward 806 So. 2d 877 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Morace v. Melvyn's Restaurant, Inc. 719 So. 2d 139 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
Lighting was not at issue in Kimble v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., (La.
DUPRE' v. Maison Blanche, Inc. 712 So. 2d 567 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Kimble v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Lopez v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 700 So. 2d 215 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
Kimble v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Matthews v. Schwegmann Giant Supermarkets, Inc., (La.App.
Stark v. National Tea Co. 655 So. 2d 769 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
Kimble v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., ().
Breaux v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 635 So. 2d 667 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
App. 3rd Cir.1992); Friedrichs v. State Farm Fire & Cas., (La.App.
Cobb v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 624 So. 2d 5 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
Thompson v. American National Fire Insurance Co. 617 So. 2d 171 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
See, Kimble v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Lloyd v. TG & Y Stores Co., (La.App.
Perez v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 608 So. 2d 1006 La. 1992
Kimble v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Thibodeaux v. Winn-Dixie of Louisiana, Inc. 608 So. 2d 673 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
Brown v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc., Kimble v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Marshall v. a & P Food Co. of Tallulah 587 So. 2d 103 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
See also Kimble v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Lloyd v. TG & Y Stores Co., (La.App.
McLaughlin v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co. 582 So. 2d 203 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Kimble v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., (La.App.
Wyble v. Allstate Ins. Co. 581 So. 2d 325 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
in part, amended in part, Koury v. Lanier Exp., Inc., (La.App.
Tobin v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 575 So. 2d 946 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
Kimble v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., and Bell v. Bestyet Discount Foods No. 2, (La.
Hutchinson v. Wal-Mart, Inc. 573 So. 2d 1148 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
See, Kimble v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Lloyd v. TG & Y Stores Co., (La.App.
Wells v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc. 572 So. 2d 210 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
In Kimble v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., the Louisiana Supreme Court observed that: “An actor’s duty to keep a proper lookout is diminished when shelved merchandise distracts his attention.” However, the Supreme Court clearly indicated that, while the actor’s diminished duty to maintain a lookout is a major factor in apportioning fault, it d
Peter v. Allstate Ins. Co. 563 So. 2d 1309 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
3rd Cir.1988), modified (La.
Davis v. Husqvarna Motor 561 So. 2d 847 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
3rd Cir.1988), writ granted, affirmed in part, amended in part
Matthews v. Schwegmann Giant Supermarkets, Inc. 555 So. 2d 671 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
(rehearing granted only as to costs).
Lewis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 546 So. 2d 267 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
3 Cir.1988), writ granted, aff'd in part and amended in part, (La.