Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Hogan v. Hogan, 549 So. 2d 267.

80 citing documents.

Stanford Barnett v. the Arc of Acadiana, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
(citing 1 M. Planiol, Civil Law Treatise, pt.
Lindley Scott Holleman v. Natalie Louise Barrilleaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
Lindley Scott Holleman v. Natalie Louise Barrilleaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
Peyton Pettit Greene Versus Landon Ronald Greene La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
Wiles v. Wiles 193 So. 3d 397 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
(citing 1 M. Planiol, Civil Law Treatise, Pt.
State of Louisiana, Department of Children and Family Services, in the Interest of A.L. v. Thomas Robert Lowrie 167 So. 3d 573 La. 2015
(citing 1 M. Planiol, Civil Law Treatise, Pt.
State, Department of Social Services Office of Family Support Ex Rel. Douglas v. Williams 76 So. 3d 103 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
Louisiana law ‘abhors a gap in the support of one in need.’ ” Fink v. Bryant, 2001-0987 (La.11/28/01), , (La.
Vaccari v. Vaccari 50 So. 3d 139 La. 2010
Louisiana law ‘abhors a gap in the support of one in need.’ ” Fink v. Bryant, 01-0987 (La.11/28/01)
Smith v. Smith 31 So. 3d 453 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2010
State ex rel. B.H. v. A.H. 968 So. 2d 881 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
(citing 1 M. Planiol, Civil Law Treatise, pt.
State Ex Rel. BH v. AH 968 So. 2d 881 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
(citing 1 M. Planiol, Civil Law Treatise, pt.
State v. White 954 So. 2d 291 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
Stogner v. Stogner, 98-3044 (La.07/07/99), ; Harper v. Harper, 33,452 (La.App.
Reggio v. Reggio 956 So. 2d 637 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
Kirkpatrick v. Kirkpatrick 948 So. 2d 390 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
Bagwell, supra, citing Stogner v. Stogner, 98-3044 (La.7/7/99), ; (La.
State Department of Social Services v. Smith 902 So. 2d 516 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
State, Department of Social Services ex rel. Clark v. Ruiz 898 So. 2d 514 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
DEPT. OF SOC. SERVS. EX REL. CLARK v. Ruiz 898 So. 2d 514 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
Borne v. Sutton 892 So. 2d 128 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Schuler v. Schuler 876 So. 2d 196 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
Schmidt v. Schmidt 839 So. 2d 150 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
Reeves v. Reeves 823 So. 2d 1023 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
Stogner v. Stogner, 98-3044 (La.7/7/99), ; Harper v. Harper, 33,452 (La.App.2d Cir.6/21/00), .
Walden v. Walden 835 So. 2d 513 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
9:315.21(C) [3] ; -74 (La.1989); State, Department of Social Services, Support Enforcement Services, ex rel.
Gautney v. Gautney 814 So. 2d 717 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
Bagwell v. Bagwell 812 So. 2d 854 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
Stogner v. Stogner, 98-3044 (La.07/07/99), ; Harper v. Harper, 33,452 (La.App.2d Cir.06/21/00), .
Fink v. Bryant 801 So. 2d 346 La. 2001
Rachal v. Rachal 795 So. 2d 1286 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
Stogner v. Stogner, supra ; McDaniel v. McDaniel, supra .
STATE IN INTEREST OF GILBERT v. Gilbert 775 So. 2d 1182 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
Grimm v. Grimm 766 So. 2d 621 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
State in the Interest of M.L. 761 So. 2d 103 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
(citing 1 M. Planiol, Civil Law Treatise, pt.
State Ex Rel. Ml 761 So. 2d 103 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
(citing 1 M. Planiol, Civil Law Treatise, pt.
Stogner v. Stogner 739 So. 2d 762 La. 1999
Falterman v. Falterman 726 So. 2d 1023 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
STATE, IN INTEREST OF PENN v. Penn 712 So. 2d 625 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Hester v. Hester 708 So. 2d 462 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
State ex rel. Department of Health & Human Resources v. Duvigneaud 704 So. 2d 398 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
discussed the issue of retroactivity at length and determined that retroactivity was intrinsic to and inherent in the very concept of support under our civilian legal system: That our substantive law abhors a gap in the support of one in need is plain from its establishment of alimony as a right in the inte
STATE THROUGH DHHR v. Duvigneaud 704 So. 2d 398 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
discussed the issue of retroactivity at length and determined that retroactivity was intrinsic to and inherent in the very concept of support under our civilian legal system: That our substantive law abhors a gap in the support of one in need is plain from its establishment of alimony as a right in the inte
Welborne v. Welborne 694 So. 2d 578 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
Green v. Scott 687 So. 2d 655 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
citing 1 M. Planiol, Civil Law Treatise, pt.
Roberts v. Roberts 677 So. 2d 1042 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
Farris v. Farris 673 So. 2d 1276 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Veron v. Veron 657 So. 2d 156 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
the supreme court reinstated the judgment of the trial court, reversing the court of appeal's reduction from $2,100.00 to $1,802.00 per month.
Trahan v. Panagiotis 654 So. 2d 398 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Hester v. Hester 647 So. 2d 1095 La. 1994
Hester v. Hester 643 So. 2d 216 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
State on Behalf of Taylor v. Thomas 639 So. 2d 837 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
I wherein the Supreme Court held that when the appellate court finds an abuse of discretion in a child support order "it is required to assess the evidence anew from the record and render a judgment on the merits as if it were a trial court, rather than to remand the case for further proceedings below."
Hernandez v. Hernandez 640 So. 2d 818 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Stewart v. Carter 634 So. 2d 1226 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Preis v. Preis 631 So. 2d 1349 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Widman v. Widman 631 So. 2d 689 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Schulz v. Schulz 630 So. 2d 847 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by