Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Habig v. Popeye's Inc., 553 So. 2d 963.
-
Akili Johari Senior v. Overlog Inc.
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
4/10/95), and then citing Habig v. Popeye’s Inc., (La.
-
Trever Bertrand v. Howard Desselle,luke B. Aguillard State of Louisiana Thru the Dept. of Pub. Safety & State …
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
4 Cir.1982); Habig v. Popeye’s, Inc., (La.App.
-
Stewart Contractors v. Metalpro Indus.
969 So. 2d 653
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
Habig v. Popeye's, Inc., -67 (La.App.
-
Lightfoot v. David Wade Correctional Center
775 So. 2d 1211
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
4th Cir.1991); Habig v, Popeye’s, Inc., (La.App.
-
Strahan v. Maytag Corp.
760 So. 2d 463
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Jurisprudence indicates that transfer rather than dismissal has been limited to cases where the plaintiff “does not have sufficient knowledge to ascertain the correct venue.” Marler v. Petty, 94-1851, Habig v. Popeye’s Inc., , (La.App.
-
Green v. Alaska Nat. Ins. Co.
759 So. 2d 165
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
Marler v. Petty, 94-1851 (La.4/10/95), ; (La.App.
-
Simien v. Fairfield Industries, Inc.
753 So. 2d 918
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Marler v. Petty, 94-1851 (La.4/10/95), ; Habig v. Po *920 peye’s Inc., (La.App.
-
Charles v. First Financial Insurance
709 So. 2d 999
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
5 Cir.1993), writ denied ; and Habig v. Popeye’s Inc., , (La.
-
Coleman v. Fisher Lumber Corp.
677 So. 2d 678
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
3d Cir.1984); Habig v. Popeye's, Inc., (La.
-
Trahan v. STATE EX REL. DEPT. OF HEALTH AND HOSPITALS
663 So. 2d 242
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
3 Cir.1988); Borne, supra; (La.App.
-
McCrea v. Mobil Oil Corp.
662 So. 2d 143
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
Relying on Thibodeaux, supra, and Habig v. Popeye's, Inc., (La.App.
-
Marler v. Petty
653 So. 2d 1167
La. 1995
4th Cir.1982); Habig v. Popeye's, Inc., (La.App.
-
Cochren v. Louisiana Power & Light Co.
639 So. 2d 342
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
NOTES [1] The trial court found that the improper venue was the result of Cochren's inadvertence and, in accordance with Habig v. Popeye's, Inc., (La.App.
-
Wagoner v. Dyson
618 So. 2d 432
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
There has been no proof, as contemplated by Habig v. Popeye’s Inc., (La.App.
-
Spott v. Otis Elevator Co.
601 So. 2d 1355
La. 1992
Habig v. Popeye's, Inc., (La.App.
-
Phillips Petroleum Co. v. OKC Ltd. Partnership
582 So. 2d 351
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
See Habig v. Popeye’s Inc., (La.App.