Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Williams, 524 So. 2d 746.

43 citing documents.

  • State Of Louisiana v. Jaquan Battley La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2023
  • State v. Dominguez 148 So. 3d 648 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    “In order to preserve the complaint that the prosecutor’s use of a peremptory exception was based on race, the defense must make an objection before the entire jury panel is sworn.”
  • State of Louisiana v. Robert Daniel Wilkins La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    State v. Green, 94-0887 at p. 20 (La.5/22/95), see also La.
  • State v. Wilkins 94 So. 3d 983 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    State v. Green, 94-0887 at p. 20 (La.5/22/95), ; see also La.
  • State v. Maxwell 83 So. 3d 113 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    art. 795(C) expressly requires an objection to be made that the State “has excluded a juror solely on the basis of race....” “In order to preserve the complaint that the prosecutor’s use of a peremptory challenge was based on race, the defendant must make an objection before the entire jury panel is sworn.”
  • State v. Cheatteam 986 So. 2d 738 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
  • State v. Draughn 950 So. 2d 583 La. 2007
  • State v. Weary 931 So. 2d 297 La. 2006
    See, e.g. State v. Givens, 99-3518(La.01/18/01), ; State v. Myers, 99-1801(La.04/11/00)
  • State v. Price 917 So. 2d 1201 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    State v. Green, 94-0887 (La.5/22/95)
  • State v. Duncan 802 So. 2d 533 La. 2001
    State v. Green , 94-0887 at p. 20 (La.5/22/95), ; see also La.
  • State v. Joe 678 So. 2d 586 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
    State v. Matthews, 26,550 (La.App.2d Cir. 1/19/95), , writ denied 95-0435 (La.
  • State v. Parker 661 So. 2d 603 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
  • State v. Green 655 So. 2d 272 La. 1995
  • State v. Green 655 So. 2d 252 La. 1995
  • State v. Stracener 651 So. 2d 463 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
  • State v. Matthews 649 So. 2d 1022 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
  • State v. Mamon 648 So. 2d 1347 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
  • State v. Wise 644 So. 2d 230 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
  • State v. Green 634 So. 2d 503 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
    appeal after remand, (La.
  • Ambrose v. New Orleans Police Dept. 627 So. 2d 233 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
  • State v. Davis 626 So. 2d 800 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
  • State v. Porter 615 So. 2d 507 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
  • State v. Miles 613 So. 2d 1047 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
    In 1988, determined that the language in Batson, supra, suggests that the "ruling on the objection must be made at some time before the completion of the jury panel."
  • State v. Young 613 So. 2d 631 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
  • State v. Aubrey 609 So. 2d 1183 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
  • State v. Knighten 609 So. 2d 950 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
  • State v. Jones 593 So. 2d 1301 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
  • State v. Potter 591 So. 2d 1166 La. 1991
    NOTES [1] In this case, (per curiam), wherein we made clear that a defendant wishing to raise a Batson claim must comply with the contemporaneous objection rule and make known his complaint during jury selection or waive the claim.
  • State v. Bennett 591 So. 2d 1193 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
  • State v. Otis 586 So. 2d 595 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
  • State v. Potter 578 So. 2d 528 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
  • State v. Lamark 584 So. 2d 686 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
  • State v. Lindsey 583 So. 2d 1200 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
    the court observed: "[T]he very basis of the contemporaneous objection requirement (and of the prohibition against raising unobjected to errors on appeal) is to require the objecting party to call the error to the court's attention at a time when the court can effectively correct it."
  • State v. Cannon 572 So. 2d 740 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
    1712 , 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986) and the Louisiana Supreme Court cases following Batson
  • State v. Henderson 571 So. 2d 770 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
  • State v. Johnson 561 So. 2d 922 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
  • State v. Collier 553 So. 2d 815 La. 1989
  • State v. Young 551 So. 2d 695 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
    5th Cir.1987), judgment amended, (La.App.
  • State v. Jackson 548 So. 2d 29 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
  • State v. Williams 545 So. 2d 651 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
    5th Cir. 1987), writ granted in part
  • State v. Adams 533 So. 2d 1060 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
  • State v. White 535 So. 2d 929 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
  • State v. Stewart 530 So. 2d 1263 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988