DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Roebuck, 530 So. 2d 1242.

54 citing documents.

  • State v. Lewis 126 So. 3d 652 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    4 Cir. 6/18/03) , ; or where there was a possible third suspect who had witnessed the defendant’s arrest at his car, (La.App.
  • State v. Brown 32 So. 3d 939 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    The state does not attempt to argue that exigent circumstances were present, but cites this court’s (La.App.
  • State v. Young 997 So. 2d 718 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    4 Cir. 6/29/95) , ; (La.
  • State v. Jerome 983 So. 2d 214 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    4 Cir. 6/29/95) , ; (La.App.
  • State v. McLeod 843 So. 2d 1268 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
  • State v. Hickerson 838 So. 2d 21 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    173 , 38 L.Ed.2d 68 (1973); (La.App.
  • State v. Kirk 833 So. 2d 418 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    173 , 38 L.Ed.2d 68 (1973); (La.App.
  • State v. Legett 819 So. 2d 1104 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    rant.” our Supreme Court held that probable cause exists when: the facts and circumstances within the affiant’s knowledge, and those of which he has reasonably trustworthy information, are sufficient to support a reasonable belief that evidence or contraband may be found at the place to be searched, (citations omitted) See also, (La.App.
  • State v. Holmes 791 So. 2d 669 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
  • State v. Julian 785 So. 2d 872 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
  • State v. Crowell 773 So. 2d 871 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    (citations omitted) See also, (La.App.
  • State v. Gereighty 775 So. 2d 468 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    nt.” our Supreme Court held that probable cause exists when: the facts and circumstances within the affiant’s knowledge, and those of which he has reasonably trustworthy information, are sufficient to support a reasonable belief that evidence or contraband may be found at the place |4to be searched, (citations omitted) See also, (La.App.
  • State v. Tassin 758 So. 2d 351 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Hoffpauir 731 So. 2d 1026 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    (citations omitted) See also, (La.App.
  • State v. Clay 731 So. 2d 414 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    281 , 88 L.Ed.2d 246 ; (La.App.
  • State v. Mitchell 731 So. 2d 319 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
  • State v. Bradford 729 So. 2d 1049 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
    (citations omitted) See also, (La.App.
  • State v. Dillon 719 So. 2d 1064 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    The authority for such a (La.App.
  • State v. Tanner 696 So. 2d 111 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
  • State v. Page 680 So. 2d 700 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
    (citations omitted) See also, (La.App.
  • State v. Mitchell 679 So. 2d 178 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
  • State v. Ennis 676 So. 2d 196 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    409 , 83 L.Ed.2d 246 (1984); United States v. Rubin, 474 F.2d 262 (3rd Cir.1973); (La.App.
  • State v. Laird 674 So. 2d 425 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
  • State v. Cain 670 So. 2d 515 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
  • State v. Alaimo 657 So. 2d 1102 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
    The authority for such a (La.App.
  • State v. Matthews 654 So. 2d 868 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
  • State v. Byas 648 So. 2d 37 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
    409 , 83 L.Ed.2d 246 (1984); United States v. Rubin, 474 F.2d 262 (3rd Cir.1974); (La.App.
  • State v. Sterling 641 So. 2d 696 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
    173 , 38 L.Ed.2d 68 (1973); (La.App.
  • State v. Scull 639 So. 2d 1239 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
  • State v. Isaac 639 So. 2d 337 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
  • State v. Campbell 640 So. 2d 622 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
  • State v. Irby 632 So. 2d 801 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
  • State v. Hills 626 So. 2d 452 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
  • State v. Tate 623 So. 2d 908 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
  • State v. Dubuclet 623 So. 2d 668 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
    “Probable cause to arrest exists when the facts and circumstances known to the officer and of which he has reasonably trustworthy information are sufficient to justify a man of ordinary caution to believe the person to be arrested has committed a crime.” (La.App.
  • State v. Parker 622 So. 2d 791 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
  • State v. Thornton 621 So. 2d 173 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
    281 , 88 L.Ed.2d 246 (1985); (La.App.
  • State v. Hunter 621 So. 2d 161 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
  • State v. Ginorio 619 So. 2d 790 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
  • State v. Williams 619 So. 2d 650 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
    409 , 83 L.Ed.2d 246 (1984); United States v. Rubin, 474 F.2d 262 (3rd Cir.1974); (La.App.
  • State v. Johnson 617 So. 2d 18 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
    173 , 38 L.Ed.2d 68 (1973); (La.App.
  • State v. Davis 612 So. 2d 1052 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
  • State v. Carey 609 So. 2d 897 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
  • State v. Noto 596 So. 2d 416 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
    281 , 88 L.Ed.2d 246 (1985); (La.App.
  • State v. Johnson 582 So. 2d 885 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
    reciting facts establishing the cause for the issuance of the warrant.” Probable cause exists when “the facts and circumstances within the affiant’s knowledge, and those of which he has reasonable trustworthy information, are sufficient to support a reasonable belief that evidence or contraband may be found at the place to be searched.” (La.App.
  • State v. James 581 So. 2d 349 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
  • State v. Ross 561 So. 2d 1004 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
  • State v. Addison 551 So. 2d 687 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
    State v. Morris, 444 So.2d at 1202; (La.App.
  • State v. Jackson 548 So. 2d 945 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
  • State v. Hill 546 So. 2d 212 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989