DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Martin, 539 So. 2d 1235.

74 citing documents.

  • State v. Melancon 826 So. 2d 633 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
  • State v. Robinson 820 So. 2d 571 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    State v. Casey, 99-0023, p. 17 (La.1/26/00), , (closing arguments that referred to "smoke screen" tactics and defense as "commie pinkos" were felt to be in poor taste, but not so prejudicial as to constitute reversible error).
  • State v. Huckabay 809 So. 2d 1093 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    104 , 148 L.Ed.2d 62 (2000), (closing argument that referred to "smoke screen" tactics and defense as "commie pinkos" was inarticulate but not improper).
  • State v. Offray 797 So. 2d 764 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
  • State v. Pena 788 So. 2d 472 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
  • State v. Whitton 770 So. 2d 844 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Hoffman 768 So. 2d 542 La. 2000
    (closing arguments referring to "smoke screen" tactics and defense "commipinkos" held inarticulate but not improper); (prosecutor's waving a gruesome photo at jury and urging jury to look at it if they become "weak kneed" during deliberations held not imp
  • State v. Casey 775 So. 2d 1022 La. 2000
    (holding closing arguments that referred to "smoke screen" tactics and defense as "commie pinkos" inarticulate but not improper); (holding prosecutor's waving gruesome photo at jury and urging members to look at it if they became "weak kneed" during delib
  • State v. Howard 751 So. 2d 783 La. 1999
    See, e.g., State v. *812 Martin, (closing arguments referring to "smoke screen" tactics and defense "commie pinkos" held inarticulate but not improper); (La.
  • State v. Baker 720 So. 2d 767 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
    1990) the Supreme Court used the "substantial factor" standard and cited State v. Matthews, supra .
  • State v. Wafer 719 So. 2d 156 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
  • State v. Tyler 723 So. 2d 939 La. 1998
  • State v. Langley 711 So. 2d 651 La. 1998
  • State v. D.L. 697 So. 2d 706 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
    State v. Wilcoxon, 26126 (La.App.2d Cir. 6/22/94), , writ denied, 94-1961 (La.12/16/94), ; State v. Beason, 26725 (La.
  • State v. DL 697 So. 2d 706 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
    State v. Wilcoxon, 26126 (La.App.2d Cir. 6/22/94), , writ denied, 94-1961 (La.12/16/94), ; State v. Beason, 26725 (La.
  • State v. Francis 665 So. 2d 596 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
  • State v. Fenner 664 So. 2d 1315 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
    State v. Wilcoxon, 26, 126 (La.App.
  • State v. Beason 653 So. 2d 1274 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
    State v. Wilcoxon, 26,126 (La.App.
  • State v. Wilcoxon 639 So. 2d 385 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
  • State v. Wilcoxon 639 So. 2d 385 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
  • State v. Ricks 637 So. 2d 1239 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
  • State v. Ritchie 590 So. 2d 1139 La. 1991
  • State v. Rock 571 So. 2d 908 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
  • State v. Jackson 568 So. 2d 599 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990