DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Duplissey, 550 So. 2d 590.

19 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Prince Record La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
    the Louisiana Court held that an unauthorized communication to the jury by the bailiff was presumed to be prejudicial when it was about a matter pending before the trial court.
  • State v. Record 266 So. 3d 592 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
    In State v. Duplissey , the Louisiana Court held that an unauthorized communication to the jury by the bailiff was presumed to be prejudicial when it was about a matter pending before the trial court.
  • State v. Broadway 252 So. 3d 878 La. 2018
    See , e.g. , State v. Duplissey , (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Jeffrey Clark 220 So. 3d 583 La. 2016
  • State of Louisiana v. Draymond Paul Compton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
  • State v. Compton 66 So. 3d 619 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
  • State v. Harry 11 So. 3d 1244 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
  • State v. Pennison 986 So. 2d 256 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
  • State v. Smith 952 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
  • State v. Videau 900 So. 2d 855 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
  • State v. Manning 885 So. 2d 1044 La. 2004
  • State v. McKinsey 779 So. 2d 993 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    2092 , 104 L.Ed.2d 655 (1989) in support of his position.
  • State v. Clark 732 So. 2d 138 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    the Louisiana Court held that an unauthorized communication to the jury by the bailiff was presumed to be prejudicial when it was about a matter pending before the trial court.
  • State v. Butler 714 So. 2d 877 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
    where the Louisiana Supreme Court reversed a defendant's conviction because of evidence that the jury had spoken with a bailiff about the process of deliberation.
  • State v. Rodriguez 703 So. 2d 803 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
  • Owens v. Concordia Elec. Co-Op., Inc. 699 So. 2d 434 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
  • State v. McCants 644 So. 2d 752 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
  • State v. Brossette 634 So. 2d 1309 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
    Defendant, argues that any private conversations or contact with a juror in violation of a sequestration order is presumptively prejudicial.
  • State v. Howard 573 So. 2d 481 La. 1991