Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Burrell, 561 So. 2d 692.

111 citing documents.

State v. Robinson 874 So. 2d 66 La. 2004
State v. Legrand 864 So. 2d 89 La. 2004
State v. Clark 851 So. 2d 1055 La. 2003
However, comparative proportionality review remains a relevant consideration in determining the issue of excessiveness in Louisiana, Thompson, , though this court has set aside only one death penalty as disproportionately excessive under the post-1976 statutes, finding in that one case, inter alia, a sufficiently "large number of persuasive mitigating factors."
State v. Taylor 838 So. 2d 729 La. 2003
State v. Quiambao 833 So. 2d 1103 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
State v. Wright 834 So. 2d 974 La. 2002
State v. Bowie 813 So. 2d 377 La. 2002
State v. Casey, 99-0023, p. 25 (La.1/26/00), 775 So.2d, 1022, 1041 .
State v. Lewis 815 So. 2d 166 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
State v. Ball 824 So. 2d 1089 La. 2002
State v. Irish 807 So. 2d 208 La. 2002
State v. Deal 802 So. 2d 1254 La. 2001
State v. Duncan 802 So. 2d 533 La. 2001
State v. Neal 796 So. 2d 649 La. 2001
State v. Smith 793 So. 2d 1199 La. 2001
State v. Deruise 802 So. 2d 1224 La. 2001
Castleberry, 758 So.2d at 774-75
State v. Cosey 779 So. 2d 675 La. 2000
However, comparative proportionality review remains a relevant consideration in determining the issue of excessiveness in Louisiana, cert.
State v. Miller 776 So. 2d 396 La. 2000
See State v. Tart, 93-0772 (La.2/9/96), ; cert.
State v. Davis 768 So. 2d 201 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
State v. Tilley 767 So. 2d 6 La. 2000
State v. Hoffman 768 So. 2d 542 La. 2000
State v. Anthony 776 So. 2d 376 La. 2000
State v. Thompson 758 So. 2d 972 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
State v. Easter 756 So. 2d 703 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
App.2d Cir.1/31/97), , citing, (La.
State v. Jetton 756 So. 2d 1206 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
State v. Casey 775 So. 2d 1022 La. 2000
State v. Ruffins 748 So. 2d 614 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
State v. Ruffins 748 So. 2d 614 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
State v. Blackwell 746 So. 2d 205 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
State v. Lucky 755 So. 2d 845 La. 1999
State v. Thibodeaux 750 So. 2d 916 La. 1999
State v. Edwards 750 So. 2d 893 La. 1999
State v. Hampton 750 So. 2d 867 La. 1999
State v. Wessinger 736 So. 2d 162 La. 1999
However, comparative proportionality review remains a relevant consideration in determining the issue of excessiveness in Louisiana, though this Court has set aside only one death penalty as disproportionately excessive under the post-1976 statutes, finding in that one case, inter alia, a sufficiently "large number of persuasive mitigating factors."
State v. Howard 751 So. 2d 783 La. 1999
However, comparative proportionality review remains a relevant consideration in determining the issue of excessiveness in Louisiana, (La.
State v. Snyder 750 So. 2d 832 La. 1999
State v. Castleberry 758 So. 2d 749 La. 1999
However, comparative proportionality review remains a relevant consideration in determining the issue of excessiveness in Louisiana, State v. Burrell, *775 though this Court has set aside only one death penalty as disproportionately excessive under the post-1976 statutes, finding in that one case, inter alia, a sufficiently "large number of persuasive mitigating factors."
State v. Jordan 728 So. 2d 954 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
State v. Frost 727 So. 2d 417 La. 1998
State v. Cooks 720 So. 2d 637 La. 1998
State v. Tyler 723 So. 2d 939 La. 1998
State v. Letulier 750 So. 2d 784 La. 1998
State v. Williams 708 So. 2d 703 La. 1998
State v. Robertson 712 So. 2d 8 La. 1998
310 , 136 L.Ed.2d 227 (1996); cert.
State v. Craig 699 So. 2d 865 La. 1997
State v. Boykin 688 So. 2d 1250 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
State v. Barnes 685 So. 2d 1148 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
State v. Roy 681 So. 2d 1230 La. 1996
However, comparative proportionality review remains a relevant consideration in determining the issue of excessiveness in Louisiana, though the Court has set aside only one death penalty as disproportionately excessive under the post-1976 statutes, finding in that one case, inter alia, a sufficiently "large number of persuasive mitigating factors."
State v. Tart 672 So. 2d 116 La. 1996
State v. Salat 672 So. 2d 333 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
State v. Sterling 670 So. 2d 1316 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996