DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Augustine, 555 So. 2d 1331.

179 citing documents.

  • State v. Lutcher 700 So. 2d 961 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
  • State v. White 695 So. 2d 1020 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    the Louisiana Supreme Court held that failure to waive the twenty-four hour delay voided the defendant’s sentence if the defendant attacks his sentence, even though he fails to specifically allege this failure as an error on appeal.
  • State v. Boswell 689 So. 2d 627 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
  • State v. Perez 686 So. 2d 114 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    *118 -1334 (La.1990), the Louisiana Supreme Court held that a trial court's failure to observe the 24-hour delay is not harmless error if the defendant assigns the failure as error, challenges the sentence on appeal, or demonstrates prejudice.
  • State v. Seals 684 So. 2d 368 La. 1996
    where there was to be a decision by the trial judge on the term of years to be imposed.
  • State v. Lavigne 683 So. 2d 905 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
  • State v. Williams 677 So. 2d 692 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
  • Followed State v. Green 666 So. 2d 1302 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
  • State v. Handley 662 So. 2d 177 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
    -1335 (La.1990); , 250 n. 3 (La.App.
  • State v. Stewart 648 So. 2d 15 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
  • State v. Martin 643 So. 2d 830 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
  • State v. Gaudet 638 So. 2d 1216 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
  • State v. McKinney 637 So. 2d 1120 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
    [2] where the Court held that the failure to waive the twenty-four hour delay could not be considered to be harmless if the defendant challenges his sentence on appeal.
  • State v. Barr 638 So. 2d 290 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
  • State v. Smiley 638 So. 2d 299 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
    the Supreme Court held that the trial court’s failure to observe the twenty-four hour delay did not constitute harmless error, even if the appellant did not raise that issue as error on his appeal, where the appellant argued his sentence on appeal.
  • State v. Green 634 So. 2d 503 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
    the Supreme Court held that the trial court's failure to observe the twenty-four hour delay was not harmless error if the defendant challenged his sentence on appeal.
  • State v. McPherson 630 So. 2d 935 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
  • State v. Folse 623 So. 2d 59 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
  • State v. Thomas 620 So. 2d 469 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
    the Louisiana Supreme Court held that failure to waive the twenty-four hour delay voided the defendant’s sentence if the defendant attacks his sentence, even though the defendant fails to specifically allege this failure as an error on appeal.
  • State v. Dixon 620 So. 2d 904 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
    Nevertheless, -1335 (La.1990), the Louisiana Supreme Court implied that a failure to observe the twenty-four hour delay provided in article 873 will be considered harmless error where the defendant could not show that he suffered prejudice from the violation.
  • State v. LeBlanc 618 So. 2d 949 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
    -34 (La.1990), the Supreme Court held that a trial court's failure to observe the twenty-four hour delay is not harmless error if the defendant challenges the sentence on appeal.
  • State v. Claxton 603 So. 2d 247 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
    -34 (La.1990), the Supreme Court held that a trial court's failure to observe the twenty-four hour delay is not harmless error if the defendant challenges the sentence on appeal.
  • State v. Ducre 604 So. 2d 702 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
    Nevertheless, -1335 (La.1990), the Louisiana Supreme Court implied that a failure to observe the twenty-four hour delay provided in Article 873 will be considered harmless error where the defendant could not show that he suffered prejudice from the violation.
  • State v. Cage 594 So. 2d 1114 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
  • State v. Dauzat 590 So. 2d 768 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
  • State v. Harrison 588 So. 2d 771 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
  • State v. Washington 588 So. 2d 753 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
    977 , (1972), on subsequent app.
  • State v. Collins 584 So. 2d 356 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
  • State v. Avila 563 So. 2d 990 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990