Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Brooks, 541 So. 2d 801.

94 citing documents.

State v. Washington 769 So. 2d 1235 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
State v. Washington 769 So. 2d 1235 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
State v. Hobley 752 So. 2d 771 La. 1999
State v. Brooks (Brooks I)
State v. Jackson 746 So. 2d 638 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. Hampton 750 So. 2d 867 La. 1999
this court approved the State's introduction in its case-in-chief in the penalty phase of two unrelated and unadjudicated murders once the trial judge determined that: (1) the evidence of the Defendant's commission of the unrelated criminal conduct is clear and convincing; (2) the proffered evidence is othe
State v. Hernandez 735 So. 2d 888 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
State v. Revader 735 So. 2d 875 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
State v. Lewis 736 So. 2d 1004 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. Castleberry 758 So. 2d 749 La. 1999
we enunciated a three-part test to be used in determining whether evidence of unadjudicated crimes should be admitted in the penalty phase of a first degree murder case.
State v. Brumfield 737 So. 2d 660 La. 1998
*664 this court approved the prosecutor's introduction in the case-in-chief in the penalty phase of two unrelated and unadjudicated murders when the trial judge had determined in a separate hearing that (1) the evidence of the defendant's commission of the unrelated criminal conduct was clear and convincing; (2)
State v. Cooks 720 So. 2d 637 La. 1998
"[I]f the admitted confession is reliable and trustworthy, then it alone may be sufficient to satisfy the clear and convincing evidentiary standard"
State v. Letulier 750 So. 2d 784 La. 1998
this Court approved the state's introduction in its case-in-chief in the penalty phase of two unrelated and unadjudicated murders once the trial judge determined that: (1) the evidence of the defendant's commission of the unrelated criminal conduct is clear and convincing; (2) the proffered evidence is other
State v. Langley 711 So. 2d 651 La. 1998
State v. Connolly 707 So. 2d 1249 La. 1998
P. art. 905.2 (Brooks I).
State v. Burmaster 710 So. 2d 274 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
State v. Johnson 706 So. 2d 468 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
State v. Gaines 701 So. 2d 688 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
State v. Jackson 707 So. 2d 990 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
2680 , 125 L.Ed.2d 321 (1993); State v. Lott, 27,849 (La.App.2d Cir. 04/03/96), .
State v. Comeaux 699 So. 2d 16 La. 1997
State v. Connolly 700 So. 2d 810 La. 1997
Jackson, 608 So.2d at 954-56 ; State v. Brooks (Brooks I), (La.
State v. Lavalais 685 So. 2d 1048 La. 1996
State v. Cousan 684 So. 2d 382 La. 1996
State v. Frank 679 So. 2d 1365 La. 1996
State v. Wilson 679 So. 2d 963 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
State v. White 674 So. 2d 1018 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
State v. Tart 672 So. 2d 116 La. 1996
At the time of Tart's November 1991 trial, set forth the standard for introduction of evidence of unadjudicated crimes at penalty phase determinations.
State v. Sepulvado 672 So. 2d 158 La. 1996
State v. Lott 671 So. 2d 1182 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
2680 , 125 L.Ed.2d 321 (1993)
State v. Williams 658 So. 2d 703 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
State v. Brooks 648 So. 2d 366 La. 1995
State v. Mathis 649 So. 2d 92 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
State v. Sanders 648 So. 2d 1272 La. 1994
"evidence of unadjudicated crimes at the sentencing phase of the trial will be admissible once a trial court determines...
State v. Gibson 644 So. 2d 1093 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
State v. Davis 637 So. 2d 1012 La. 1994
State v. Green 634 So. 2d 503 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
State v. Green 632 So. 2d 1187 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
State v. Code 627 So. 2d 1373 La. 1993
Jackson, 608 So.2d at 954-56
State v. Bibb 626 So. 2d 913 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
State v. Bourque 622 So. 2d 198 La. 1993
State v. Jackson 608 So. 2d 949 La. 1992
State v. Tyler 607 So. 2d 910 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
State v. Jackson 600 So. 2d 739 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
State v. Wille 559 So. 2d 1321 La. 1990
State v. Higginbotham 554 So. 2d 1308 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989