Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State Ex Rel. Porter v. Butler, 573 So. 2d 1106.

98 citing documents.

State v. Lee 764 So. 2d 1122 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
prohibits sentence enhancement of same-day convictions only if those offenses arose from a single incident or event.
State v. Wright 758 So. 2d 301 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
State v. Soileau, 95-1214 (La.App.
State v. Brooks 756 So. 2d 336 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
State v. Lawrence 752 So. 2d 934 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. Flanagan 744 So. 2d 718 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
addresses a situation in which several convictions occurred on the same day as a result of a single criminal act.
State v. Bates 742 So. 2d 1004 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
State v. Clennon 738 So. 2d 161 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
State v. Bychurch 722 So. 2d 1056 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
State v. Stack 710 So. 2d 841 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
State v. Francis 709 So. 2d 834 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
State v. Girod 703 So. 2d 771 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
State Ex Rel. Berry v. State 693 So. 2d 787 La. 1997
State ex rel. Berry v. State 693 So. 2d 787 La. 1997
State v. Keys 694 So. 2d 1107 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
State v. Kennerson 695 So. 2d 1367 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
only multiple convictions arising out of the same criminal act or episode and obtained on the same date will be considered as a single conviction for purposes of the habitual offender law....
State v. Mayweather 677 So. 2d 594 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
State v. Soileau 677 So. 2d 518 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
State v. Thomas 680 So. 2d 37 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
the Louisiana Supreme Court reaffirmed its earlier interpretation that if a habitual offender is convicted of more than one crime on the same day for criminal conduct arising out of a single transaction or criminal episode, then only one of the convictions may be used to enhance the defendant's sentences.
State v. Ward 670 So. 2d 562 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
defendant Tommy Porter was convicted of three counts of armed robbery arising out of a single criminal episode in which he robbed three occupants of an apartment while he was armed with a gun.
State v. Valentine 668 So. 2d 383 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
State v. Hyorth 661 So. 2d 1059 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
State v. Brown 656 So. 2d 1070 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
State v. Williams 655 So. 2d 375 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
State v. Spitz 650 So. 2d 271 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
State v. Youngblood 647 So. 2d 1388 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
State v. Williams 647 So. 2d 1244 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
State ex rel. Hyorth v. Shea 629 So. 2d 1156 La. 1993
State ex rel. Tucker v. State 629 So. 2d 361 La. 1993
State v. Mims 626 So. 2d 848 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
The court set aside the sentences and remanded for resentencing noting that the enhancement of defendant’s
State v. Hongo 625 So. 2d 610 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
State v. Jeffers 623 So. 2d 882 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
State v. Carouthers 618 So. 2d 880 La. 1993
State v. Guillory 617 So. 2d 151 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
State v. Wooders 615 So. 2d 936 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
State v. Williams 610 So. 2d 991 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
State v. Mims 607 So. 2d 549 La. 1992
State v. Deslatte 610 So. 2d 947 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
State v. Beach 610 So. 2d 908 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
State v. Brown 602 So. 2d 252 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
State Ex Rel. Mims v. Butler 601 So. 2d 649 La. 1992
and the "sequential requirement,"
State v. Guillory 598 So. 2d 1299 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
State v. Parker 593 So. 2d 414 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
NOTES [1] but find the modification inapplicable both temporally and factually.
State v. Otis 592 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
State v. Otis 589 So. 2d 487 La. 1991
State ex rel. Porter v. Whitley 584 So. 2d 1154 La. 1991
State ex rel. Ardis v. Smith 584 So. 2d 663 La. 1991
State ex rel. Williams v. Smith 581 So. 2d 664 La. 1991
State ex rel. Brown v. Bolin 575 So. 2d 382 La. 1991