Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State Ex Rel. Mims v. Butler, 601 So. 2d 649.

67 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Christopher Raymond Diano La. 2025
State Of Louisiana v. Demario G. Warren La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
State of Louisiana Versus Anthony O. Stokes La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
Overruled State v. Heine 140 So. 3d 278 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
which was overruled by Johnson.
State v. Blueford 137 So. 3d 54 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Overruled State v. Landfair 70 So. 3d 1061 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Sopczak 25 So. 3d 250 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. London 28 So. 3d 1150 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2009
Distinguished State v. Cass 17 So. 3d 486 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Shaw 969 So. 2d 1233 La. 2007
which approved the rationale of Porter, rendering the continued viability of Porter questionable after Johnson .
Mims v. Stalder 966 So. 2d 1249 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
State v. LeBlanc 951 So. 2d 1087 La. 2007
and held that multiple guilty pleas entered the same day, may each be used to enhance a subsequent conviction, so long as the convictions stemmed from wholly separate criminal episodes.
State of Louisiana v. Carey Louis Hood La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
10/19/04), because the purse snatching charge arose on January 30, 1991 and the simple burglary charge arose on April 4, 1991, each conviction can be used as a separate offense to habitualize the Defendant, even though he was convicted of both offenses on the same day.
State v. Hood 943 So. 2d 1277 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
10/19/04), , because the purse snatching charge arose on January 30, 1991 and the simple burglary charge arose on April 4, 1991, each conviction can be used as a separate offense to habitualize the Defendant, even though he was convicted of both offenses on the same day.
State v. Shaw 939 So. 2d 519 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
which approved the rationale of State ex rel.
State v. Spano 936 So. 2d 304 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
: convictions on the same day are to be counted as one conviction.
State v. Williams 930 So. 2d 203 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
the Louisiana Supreme *207 Court held that convictions entered on the same day were to be counted only as one conviction under the provisions of La.
State v. Williams 916 So. 2d 1285 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
Mims v. Butler, 88-KH-2816 (La.5/26/92), , which it reasoned was based on an incomplete legislative record.
State v. Galle 904 So. 2d 773 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
In Johnson the Court overruled the strict rule of conviction/ (La.
State v. Dorsey 907 So. 2d 154 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
State of Louisiana v. Carey Louis Hood La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
(on reh’g) - “that multiple convictions entered on the same day must be treated as a single predicate under the habitual offender law, even when the convictions stem from 3 face of the record whether the present offenses arose out of the same criminal episode.
State v. Hood 895 So. 2d 624 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
(on reh'g) "that multiple convictions entered on the same day must be treated as a single predicate under the habitual offender law, even when the convictions stem from separate and distinct criminal episodes."
State v. Butler 894 So. 2d 415 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
State v. Lowery 890 So. 2d 711 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
(on rehearing), both convictions could not be used to enhance his sentence.
State v. LeBlanc 897 So. 2d 736 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
State v. Johnson 884 So. 2d 568 La. 2004
(on reh'g), which held that in the absence of a clearly expressed legislative intent, Act 688 of 1982, amending Louisiana's Habitual Offender Law, LSA-R.S.
State v. Tilmon 870 So. 2d 607 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
State v. Everett 816 So. 2d 1272 La. 2002
(on rehearing), to bolster his interpretation of the meaning of subsection (B).
State v. Patin 813 So. 2d 652 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
State v. Gomez 778 So. 2d 549 La. 2001
State v. Odom 772 So. 2d 281 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
on rehearing, found that because the defendant was convicted of two separate offenses on the same day, those offenses were to be treated as one offense for multiple offender purposes.
State v. Everett 770 So. 2d 466 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
State v. Haynes 762 So. 2d 1247 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
(on rehearing) may be corrected by the district court as an "illegal sentence" under La.Code Crim.
State v. Gilbert 760 So. 2d 536 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
-655 (La.1992), on reh'g.
State v. Stokes 759 So. 2d 980 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
on reh'g, determined that La.
State v. Normandin 750 So. 2d 321 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
prohibits multiple offender adjudication from convictions received on the same day.
State v. Ball 748 So. 2d 1249 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
Mims filed for postconviction relief in 1988 asserting that his *1255 thirty-five-year sentence for purse snatching as a third offender was improper because the two predicate convictions, in 1978, occurred on the same day.
State v. Newman 750 So. 2d 252 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
(Emphasis added) -655 (La.1992), on reh'g, the Louisiana Supreme Court determined that La.R.S.
State v. Metoyer 748 So. 2d 1174 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
State v. Blackwell 746 So. 2d 205 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
State v. Gregory 745 So. 2d 723 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
State v. Pickens 741 So. 2d 696 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
State v. Bychurch 722 So. 2d 1056 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
State v. Antoine 721 So. 2d 562 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
the Louisiana Supreme Court directed as follows: Criminal and penal laws are to be strictly construed.
State v. Behrnes 706 So. 2d 179 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
State v. Deville 701 So. 2d 254 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
State v. Bindon 687 So. 2d 100 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
State v. Becnel 674 So. 2d 959 La. 1996
State v. Robertson 671 So. 2d 436 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
State v. Johnson 664 So. 2d 141 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995