Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Lewis, 539 So. 2d 1199.
- State v. Lewis 800 So. 2d 1032 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
- State v. Givens 776 So. 2d 443 La. 2001
- State v. Wolfe 761 So. 2d 596 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
- State v. Monroe 757 So. 2d 895 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
-
State v. Walker
747 So. 2d 133
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
State v. Rice, 26,478 (La.
- State v. Shipp 754 So. 2d 1068 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
-
State v. Falls
735 So. 2d 628
La. 1999
See State v. Louis, 94-0761 (La.11/30/94)
- State v. Hennis 734 So. 2d 16 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
-
State v. Buffington
731 So. 2d 340
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
art. 410(A)(4); -06 (La.1989); State v. Cinel, 95-1723, pp. 4-5 (La.App.
- State v. Edmondson 714 So. 2d 1233 La. 1998
- State v. Edmondson 699 So. 2d 882 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
- State v. Johnson 687 So. 2d 524 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
- State v. Lavalais 685 So. 2d 1048 La. 1996
- State v. Cousan 684 So. 2d 382 La. 1996
- State v. Sepulvado 672 So. 2d 158 La. 1996
- State v. Fifteen Thousand Four Hundred Thirty-One Dollars & Other Property 670 So. 2d 693 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
- State v. Brooks 648 So. 2d 366 La. 1995
- State v. Rice 648 So. 2d 426 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
- State v. Green 647 So. 2d 536 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
- State v. Louis 645 So. 2d 1144 La. 1994
- State v. Louis 634 So. 2d 1237 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
-
State v. Parker
625 So. 2d 1364
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
In support of this proposition
- State v. Gross 621 So. 2d 130 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
- State v. Cinel 619 So. 2d 770 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
-
State v. Hankerson
604 So. 2d 1330
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
-1202 (La.1989), quoting United States v. Long, 852 F.2d 975, 977 (7th Cir.1988).
-
Lewis v. State ex rel. Department of Public Safety & Corrections
602 So. 2d 68
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
(1) “[although the law of obligations (contracts) can be used by analogy to analyze the legal relations of the parties to a plea bargain, the validity of the plea bargain and the remedies for breach of it are controlled by criminal substantive and procedural law,” and (2) “[t]he trial court correctly held that a plea bargain in a criminal case is not a conventional obligation,” Justice Cole, writing for the supreme court, after noting that “a plea bargain is a contract between the state and one
-
State v. Hankerson
604 So. 2d 1323
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
-1202 (La.1989), quoting United States v. Long, 852 F.2d 975, 977 (7th Cir.1988).
- State v. Waguespack 589 So. 2d 1079 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
- State v. Sanford 569 So. 2d 147 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
- State v. Johnson 544 So. 2d 767 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989