No. 8824
Precedential
Dismissed
Processed
Gibson v. Hitchcock
Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 3d Cir., May 26, 1982 415 So. 2d 618; La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., February 14, 1978 355 So. 2d 615; La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., March 4, 1923 7 Pelt. 181
Gibson v. Hitchcock, 35 La. Ann. 1201 (1883).
Opinion text
Wlioro an appeal is taken by a wife, whose husband is not a party to the suit, dnd is unrep* resented by counsel of record, the signature of the bond of appeal, by the attorney of the wife in the name of the husband, is not sufficient evidence of the latter’s authorization to maintain the appeal, which must therefore be dismissed.