DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Duplechain v. Houston Fire & Casualty Insurance Co., 155 So. 2d 459.

22 citing documents.

  • Meziere v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. 560 So. 2d 106 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
    *108 This court in Duplechain v. Houston Fire & Casualty Insurance Company, (La.App.
  • Hopper v. Crown 555 So. 2d 46 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
    5th Cir.), writ denied, Duplechain v. Houston Fire & Casualty Insurance Company, (La.App.
  • Bryant v. Gillespie Well Service, Inc. 537 So. 2d 788 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
    Duplechain v. Houston Fire & Casualty Insurance Co., (La.App.
  • Leehans v. State Farm Ins. Co. 534 So. 2d 979 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
    See Duplechain v. Houston Fire & Casualty Insurance Company, (La.App.
  • Friar v. Caterpillar, Inc. 529 So. 2d 509 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
  • Farmers State Bank & Trust Co. v. Leger 503 So. 2d 1141 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    3rd Cir. 1970), writ denied February 4, 1971; Duplechain v. Houston Fire & Casualty Insurance Co., (La.App.
  • Evans v. Heil Co. 496 So. 2d 1120 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • Newman v. Burks 442 So. 2d 1274 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    If he does not so respond, summary judgment, if appropriate, shall be rendered against him....” In Duplechain v. Houston Fire & Casualty Insurance Company, (La.App.
  • Ardoin v. Pitre 430 So. 2d 815 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    3rd Cir.1970), writ denied February 4, 1971; Duplechain v. Houston Fire & Casualty Insurance Co., (La.App.
  • National Companies v. Bridgewater 398 So. 2d 29 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
  • Hardee v. Kilpatrick Life Ins. Co. 373 So. 2d 982 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
    3rd Cir. 1970), writ denied February 4, 1971; Duplechain v. Houston Fire & Casualty Insurance Co., (La.App.
  • Chaisson v. Domingue 365 So. 2d 1115 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
    Art. 967; Duplechain v. Houston Fire & Casualty Insurance Co., (La.App.
  • Garlington v. Kingsley 277 So. 2d 183 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1973
    3 Cir. 1968); Roy & Roy v. Riddle, supra; Duplechain v. Houston Fire & Casualty Insurance Company, (La.App.
  • Metropolitan Bank of Jefferson v. Summers 257 So. 2d 179 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1972
  • Johnson v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. 241 So. 2d 23 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
    Duplechain v. Houston Fire and Casualty Insurance Company, La.App., .
  • Aetna Insurance Co. v. Morgan & Lindsey, Inc. 238 So. 2d 212 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
  • Joiner v. Lenee 213 So. 2d 136 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1968
    966 and 967; Duplechain v. Houston Fire & Casualty Insurance Company, Touchet v. Firemen's Insurance Company of Newark, New Jersey, (La.App.3d Cir. 1962, cert.
  • Roy & Roy v. Riddle 187 So. 2d 492 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1966
  • Aymond v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Company 179 So. 2d 460 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1965
  • Francois v. Capital City Press 166 So. 2d 84 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1964
    3 Cir., , we pointed out that if the movant for a summary judgment produces convincing proof of the facts upon which the motion is based, and no counter affidavits or other receivable evidence are offered by the opposing party to contradict that proof, then a conclusion may be justified that there is no genuine issue as to th
  • Perry v. Reliance Insurance Co. of Philadelphia 157 So. 2d 903 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
    Duplechain v. Houston Fire & Casualty Insurance Co., La.App., , (Third Circuit), is cited by astute counsel for appellee in support of the contention that the burden is incumbent upon plaintiff to augment or supplement the pleadings when attack thereon is made in the form of a motion for summary judgment.
  • Shird v. Maricle 156 So. 2d 476 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1963
    3 Cir., , where the movant produced an undisputed showing which negatived any genuine issue of fact as to the plaintiff's pleaded cause of action.