Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Brown, 562 So. 2d 868.
- State Of Louisiana v. Rodney Jack Strain, Jr. La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2023
- State v. Brown 256 So. 3d 431 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
- State of Louisiana v. Marcus Donte Reed 200 So. 3d 291 La. 2016
-
In re Interdiction of Benson
216 So. 3d 950
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
“[Wjhether the declaration is a direct assertion of the speaker’s state of mind (hearsay) or, whether the declaration tends to indirectly establish the declarant’s state of mind (non-hearsay), Louisiana jurisprudence admits.the declaration if the declarant’s state of mind is at issue or is relevant to prove a fact at issue.”
-
State v. Smith
96 So. 3d 678
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Brown,, Plaisance, supra.
-
State v. Parks
2 So. 3d 470
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
5 Cir. 7/26/05) , , writ denied, 06-2241 (La.6/1/07), , citing State v. *477 Brown
- State v. Leonard 910 So. 2d 977 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
- State v. Adams 897 So. 2d 629 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
- State v. Dooley 882 So. 2d 731 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
-
State v. Schexnayder
685 So. 2d 357
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
the Louisiana Supreme Court explained as follows the intent behind the hearsay rule: Hearsay is excluded because the value of the statement rests on the credibility of the out-of-court asserter who is not subject to cross-examination and other safeguards of reliability.
- State v. Coleman 647 So. 2d 1355 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
-
State v. Pipkins
628 So. 2d 1242
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
-879 (La.1990), affirmed on remand, (La.App.
-
State v. Brown
594 So. 2d 372
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
The state's application for supervisory writs was granted, in a five to two decision, the Louisiana Supreme Court reversed our decision, reinstated defendant's conviction and sentence, and remanded the case to us for consideration of defendant's assignments of error pretermitted on the original appeal.
- State v. Revere 572 So. 2d 117 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990