Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Doyle v. Picadilly Cafeterias, 576 So. 2d 1143.

77 citing documents.

Certain Underwriters of Lloyd's London v. Alliance Drilling Consultants, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
Daniel T. Guidry v. Prime Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
Duvio v. Specialty Pools Co. 216 So. 3d 999 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
App. 4 Cir. 3/20/13), ( (La.App.
Provosty v. ARC Construction, LLC 119 So. 3d 23 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
“If the trial court submits a verdict form to the jury with misleading or confusing interrogatories, just as when it omits to instruct the jury on any applicable essential legal principles, such interrogatories do not adequately set forth the issues to be decided by the jury and may constitute reversible error.” (La.App.
Brecheen v. News Group, L.P. 105 So. 3d 1011 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Burns v. CLK Investments V, L.L.C. 45 So. 3d 1152 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Wooley v. Lucksinger 14 So. 3d 311 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Walter A. Glod, Jr., M.D. v. W. Gregory Baker La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Glod v. Baker 998 So. 2d 308 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Rayeanne Owens v. Entergy Gulf States, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Misleading or confusing interrogatories may constitute reversible error, but the manifest error standard of appellate review still applies except where the jury interrogatories “are so inadequate or incorrect as to preclude the jury from reaching a verdict based on the law and the facts.” (La.App.
Adams v. Rhodia, Inc. 983 So. 2d 798 La. 2008
Graves v. Riverwood Intern. Corp. 949 So. 2d 576 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
Narcisse Thibodeaux v. State of La, Thru the Dotd La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Johnson v. State Ex Rel. DOTD 946 So. 2d 682 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Terri Louise Smith v. Boise Cascade Corporation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Jones v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, supra; (La.App.
Ardoin v. McKay 939 So. 2d 698 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
David Bradley Ardoin v. Dr. Douglas McKay La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Maria E. Palacios v. Louisiana & Delta Railroad, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Paul M. Arceneaux v. Roy De La Rosa La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Arceneaux v. Rosa 889 So. 2d 383 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
James v. Autozone, Inc. 879 So. 2d 162 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Brantley v. State Farm Ins. Co. 865 So. 2d 265 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
Hanks v. Columbia Women's & Children's Hospital 844 So. 2d 1115 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
This court has held that “the trial court can order separate trials and render separate judgments on the principal and incidental demands, if it appears that fairness and orderly procedure would best be achieved by separate trials.” (La.App.
Smart v. Kansas City Southern RR 830 So. 2d 581 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
Fleming v. Acadian Geophysical Services, Inc. 827 So. 2d 623 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
Johnson v. First Nat. Bank of Shreveport 792 So. 2d 33 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
Kennedy v. Thomas 784 So. 2d 692 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
Ardoin v. Mills 780 So. 2d 1265 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
Asbestos v. Bordelon, Inc. 726 So. 2d 926 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
Soileau v. STATE EX REL. DEPT. OF TRANSP. AND DEV. 724 So. 2d 834 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
Doyle v. Picadilly Cafeterias, *838 (La.App.
Caubarreaux v. EI Dupont De Nemours 714 So. 2d 67 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
White v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 713 So. 2d 618 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
Ardoin v. Murdock 711 So. 2d 837 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
Johnson v. Clark 710 So. 2d 316 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
3 Cir.1990), but courts are not obligated to give the specific jury instructions submitted by the parties, (La.App.
Ford v. Beam Radiator, Inc. 708 So. 2d 1158 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
1958 , 131 L.Ed.2d 850 (1995); (La.App.
LaFrance v. Bourgeois 701 So. 2d 1026 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
Jones v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, supra; (La.App.
Louviere v. Huey P. Long Medical Center 697 So. 2d 1331 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Theriot v. Bourg 691 So. 2d 213 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
State v. Taylor 688 So. 2d 1262 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
Lee v. Automotive Cas. Ins. Co. 682 So. 2d 995 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Hebert v. Podiatry Ins. Co. of America 688 So. 2d 1107 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
3 Cir.1990), but courts are not obligated to give the specific jury instructions submitted by the parties, (La.App.
Holt v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. 680 So. 2d 117 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
Fleming v. HCA Health Serv. of La., Inc. 676 So. 2d 839 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Francis v. Brown 671 So. 2d 1041 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Courts are not obligated to give the specific jury instructions submitted by the parties, (La.App.
Brown v. Diamond Shamrock, Inc. 671 So. 2d 1049 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
O'ROURKE v. Cairns 666 So. 2d 345 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
Johnson v. Terrebonne Parish Sheriff's Office 669 So. 2d 577 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Wilson v. NATIONAL UNION FIRE INS. OF LOUISIANA 665 So. 2d 1252 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
Iorio v. Grossie 663 So. 2d 366 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Courts are not obligated to give the specific jury instructions submitted by the parties, (La.App.
Iorio v. Grossie 663 So. 2d 366 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Courts are not obligated to give the specific jury instructions submitted by the parties, (La.App.