Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Sparks v. Tulane Med. Ctr. Hosp. & Clinic, 546 So. 2d 138.

62 citing documents.

Amy Salter v. DeSoto Parish Police Jury and Jean Simpson Personnel Services La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2023
Michael Thibodeaux v. St. Mary Parish School Board La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
Smith v. Thomas 214 So. 3d 945 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
Additionally, although not having to do with the interpretation of a policy definition, it is nonetheless instructive to note that in Sparks v. Tulane Medical Center Hospital & Clinic, (La.
East Baton Rouge Parish School Board v. Green 111 So. 3d 91 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
and Clinic, -44 (1989), wherein it noted: In so-called “physical-mental” injury cases, where a mental injury or illness develops secondary to an ascertainable physical injury, Louisiana courts have uniformly found that the employee is entitled to compensation benefits for any disability resulting from the mental injury and to
Roberta Broussard v. Stine Lumber Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Broussard v. Stine Lumber Co. 82 So. 3d 1274 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Rosemary Delrie v. Peabody Magnet High School La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Delrie v. Peabody Magnet High School 40 So. 3d 1158 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Hebert v. Webre 971 So. 2d 1238 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Additionally, although not having to do with the interpretation of a policy definition, it is nonetheless instructive to note that in Sparks v. Tulane Medical Center Hospital & Clinic, (La.
Corkern v. TK VALVE 934 So. 2d 102 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
Payne v. Orleans Parish School Bd. 929 So. 2d 121 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
Jeral H. Semien v. Eads Aeroframe Services, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Semien v. EADS AEROFRAME SERVICES, LLC 893 So. 2d 215 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Sheralon F. Moore v. Pitt Grill La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
and Clinic, -44 (La.1989), where it stated: In so-called “physical-mental” injury cases, where a mental injury or illness develops secondary to an ascertainable physical injury, Louisiana courts have uniformly found that the employee is entitled to compensation benefits for any disability resul
Regan v. Lakeland Medical Center 871 So. 2d 453 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Moore v. Pitt Grill 871 So. 2d 1128 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
and Clinic, -44 (La.1989), where it stated: In so-called “physical-mental” injury cases, where a mental injury or illness develops secondary to an ascertainable physical injury, Louisiana courts have uniformly found that the employee is entitled to compensation benefits for any disability resulting from the mental injury and
Scarlet C. Adams v. Temple Inland - Louisiana La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
Adams v. TEMPLE INLAND, LA 858 So. 2d 855 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
Redmon v. Bi-Lo Supermarket 846 So. 2d 820 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Hankton v. City of New Orleans 821 So. 2d 730 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
Partin v. Merchants & Farmers Bank 810 So. 2d 1118 La. 2002
Sidwell v. Horseshoe Entertainment Ltd. Partnership 811 So. 2d 229 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
Hodapp v. Sam's Wholesale 815 So. 2d 916 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
3 Cir. 12/11/96); ; this court explained: The "event" which triggers coverage, then, may be an unexpected and sudden or violent occurrence which causes injury, or it may be an unexpected change in the employee's physical condition which renders him incapable of working, a change caused at least in part by an employment in
McGrath v. Office of Mental Health Nursing Inpatient Services 801 So. 2d 441 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Partin v. Merchants & Farmers Bank 783 So. 2d 652 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
Brown v. Ruskin Mfg. Co. 756 So. 2d 667 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
Sparks v. Tulane Medical Center Hospital & Clinic, Traweek v. City of West Monroe, 30,571 (La.App.2d Cir.5/13/98), , writ denied, 98-1936 (La.11/6/98), .
McKnight v. General Motors Corp. 750 So. 2d 454 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
Instead, which held a mental injury claimant to the general standard of a preponderance of the evidence.
Brown v. Southeast Louisiana Contractors of Norco, Inc. 749 So. 2d 791 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
23:1031; Benoit v. Maco Manufacturing, 93-0396 (La.App.
Clophus v. Taco Bell Corp./HotN'Now 732 So. 2d 692 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
Although Clophus may have been more susceptible to stressful situations than the average employee due to her past problems, "an employee may not recover for mental stress or injury related to ` general conditions of employment.'" ( , 147 *698 (La.1989)) (emphasis in Sparks opinion).
Arwood v. J P & Sons, Inc. 730 So. 2d 525 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Favorite v. LA. HEALTH CARE AUTHORITY 725 So. 2d 556 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
Edwards v. Fischbach & Moore, Inc. 722 So. 2d 344 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
Crawford v. Martin Marietta/Michoud Aerospace 713 So. 2d 781 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
and Clinic, the Supreme Court considered “whether a mental injury induced by mental stress is compensable when it is caused by a significant employment incident and is not accompanied by any apparent signs of physical trauma.” Sparks, 546 So.2d at 139
Traweek v. City of West Monroe 713 So. 2d 655 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
Quillin v. Calcasieu Marine Nat. Bank 690 So. 2d 802 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
& Clinic, [citing Malone & Johnson, 13 Louisiana Civil Law Treatise, Workers' Compensation, § 214 (1980 & 1989 Supp.)]; Lewis, .
Charles v. South Cent. Industries 683 So. 2d 706 La. 1996
& Clinic, Westley v. Land & Offshore
Renter v. Willis-Knighton Medical Center 679 So. 2d 603 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
Cressionnie v. Fisk Elec. 671 So. 2d 3 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
Henry v. Gulf Coast Cas. Ins. Co. 670 So. 2d 307 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
23:1021(7)(b) was enacted by the Louisiana Legislature as part of a package of revisions to the Workers' Compensation laws (Acts 1989, No. 454, effective January 1, 1990) which allowed recovery of workers' compensation benefits for jobrelated *309 mental injuries.
Middleton v. International Maintenance 671 So. 2d 420 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
23:1031; Benoit v. Maco Manufacturing, 93-0396, p. 11 (La.App.
Smith v. Grand Isle Shipyard 671 So. 2d 415 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
23:1031; Benoit v. Maco Manufacturing, 93-0396 (La.App.
Bradley v. Morton Thiokol, Inc. 661 So. 2d 691 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
Lewis v. Beauregard Memorial Hosp. 649 So. 2d 655 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Graham v. Georgia-Pacific Corp. 643 So. 2d 352 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
Lannes v. Jefferson Door Co. 638 So. 2d 250 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
23:1021(7)(c) was enacted by the Louisiana Legislature as part of a package of revisions to the Workers' Compensation laws (Acts 1989, No. 454, effective January 1, 1990) (La.
Crabtree v. State Farm Ins. Co. 632 So. 2d 736 La. 1994
Additionally, although not having to do with the interpretation of a policy definition, it is nonetheless instructive to note that in Sparks v. Tulane Medical Center Hospital & Clinic, , 146 *745 (La.1989), we interpreted the phrase "physical structure of the body" as it is used in the Worker's Compensation Act to include injuries to the mental health of an employee.
Bryant v. Giani Inv. Co. 626 So. 2d 390 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
Our Supreme Court allowed recovery of worker's compensation benefits for mental/
Archinard v. Rapides Parish School Board 614 So. 2d 877 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
In ruling against Archinard, the trial judge cited and relied on Sparks v. Tulane Medical Center Hospital & Clinic
Perniciaro v. Martin Marietta Corp. 613 So. 2d 775 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Sparks v. Tulane Medical Center Hospital & Clinic
Creed v. Avondale Industries, Inc. 608 So. 2d 226 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
23:1021(7)(b) (hereinafter quoted) was January 1, 1990