Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Williams v. Regional Transit Authority, 546 So. 2d 150.

82 citing documents.

Henry v. Gulf Coast Cas. Ins. Co. 670 So. 2d 307 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
23:1021(7)(b) was enacted by the Louisiana Legislature as part of a package of revisions to the Workers' Compensation laws (Acts 1989, No. 454, effective January 1, 1990) which allowed recovery of workers' compensation benefits for jobrelated *309 mental injuries.
Martin v. Elmwood Medical Center 665 So. 2d 470 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
Lacava v. Albano Cleaners 656 So. 2d 990 La. 1995
the court of appeal held that “an employer or insurer should not be penalized for seeking judicial resolution of the meaning of amendments to the statutory definition of an ‘accident’, when that issue was not conclusively resolved by the jurisprudence at the time that the claim was denied”.
Lacava v. Albano Cleaners 653 So. 2d 834 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Pappas v. Marine Spill Response Corp. 650 So. 2d 441 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
7 Viewed from this, the worker’s perspective, Bruno, supra, at 360 , the employer’s position would be meritorious had its employee’s injury arisen out of 1) an argument in which he participated and 2) the argument concerned matters unrelated to his employment.
Smith v. Radisson Suite Hotel New Orleans 650 So. 2d 333 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
Bordelon v. Management Co., Inc. 649 So. 2d 1070 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
McCoy v. Monroe Timber Co. 647 So. 2d 1383 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Frelow v. Mills 647 So. 2d 475 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Bruno, 593 So.2d at 360 .
Lewis v. Beauregard Memorial Hosp. 649 So. 2d 655 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Tarver v. Energy Drilling Co. 645 So. 2d 796 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
Williams v. Capitol Steel 644 So. 2d 705 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Layssard v. City of Alexandria 643 So. 2d 895 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Ceasar v. Crispy Cajun Restaurant 643 So. 2d 471 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Lannes v. Jefferson Door Co. 638 So. 2d 250 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
23:1021(7)(c) was enacted by the Louisiana Legislature as part of a package of revisions to the Workers' Compensation laws (Acts 1989, No. 454, effective January 1, 1990) (La.
Weber v. State 635 So. 2d 188 La. 1994
Wex S. Malone & H. Alston Johnson, 13 Louisiana Civil Law TreatiseWorkers' Compensation Law and Practice § 161 (2d ed. 1980).
Castille v. Leesville Lumber Co. 635 So. 2d 643 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Herren v. State 632 So. 2d 880 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
Kelley v. Louisiana Limestone Aggregates, Inc. 630 So. 2d 828 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
the trial judge accepted the testimony of one physician and rejected that of another; the court of appeal reversed, and the Supreme Court, in recognizing the trial judge’s prerogative, held: It is well established that the trial judge has considerable discretion in accepting or rejecting expert testimony, a
LaPrarie v. Pony Exp. Courier 628 So. 2d 192 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
Bryant v. Giani Inv. Co. 626 So. 2d 390 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
Our Supreme Court allowed recovery of worker's compensation benefits for mental/
Vincent v. Browning-Ferris, Inc. 615 So. 2d 47 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Jackson v. DC Kile, Inc. 614 So. 2d 225 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Bowens v. General Motors Corp. 608 So. 2d 999 La. 1992
Guggenheim v. Parish of Jefferson 613 So. 2d 636 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Proyer v. Monsanto Co. 606 So. 2d 1307 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
In considering the trial judge's decision to rely upon the opinion of Dr. Sanders, wherein the court said: It is well established that the trial judge has considerable discretion in accepting or rejecting expert testimony, and that the trial judge's decision to accept the testimony of one expert over another should not be disturbed absent manifest error.
Roszell v. National Union Fire Ins. Co. 602 So. 2d 87 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
Smith v. Mercy Hosp. 597 So. 2d 114 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
Prior to the amended legislation, and its comparison case
Bruno v. Harbert Intern. Inc. 593 So. 2d 357 La. 1992
Yates v. Naylor Indus. Services, Inc. 569 So. 2d 616 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
McDonald v. American General Fire and Cas. Co. 570 So. 2d 98 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
also stated that: In view of the sometimes nebulous characteristics of mental injuries and the possibility of symptoms being feigned, utmost care should be exercised in determining whether the employee proved that he suffered such an injury and proved that the injury was causally related to his employment.
Brown v. J. Manoco, Inc. 555 So. 2d 29 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989