Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Snell v. United Parcel Services, Inc., 545 So. 2d 1040.

31 citing documents.

Richard and Patricia Pannell v. the City of Scott La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
1 Cir.), writ denied, allowed the use 6 of deposition testimony when defense counsel stated that efforts to subpoena the witness were futile.
McCallon v. Key Energy Servs., LLC 271 So. 3d 249 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
Michael McCallon v. Key Energy Services, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
McLane Southern, Inc. v. Bridges 64 So. 3d 886 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Jim Walter Homes, Inc. v. John C. Guilbeau La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
1st Cir. 1989), writ denied
Jim Walter Homes, Inc. v. Guilbeau 934 So. 2d 239 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
1st Cir.1989), writ denied
Leonard v. James Indus. Constructors 879 So. 2d 724 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
1st Cir.1989), writ denied
JE Merit Constructors, Inc. v. Smith 806 So. 2d 842 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
App. 1st Cir.), writ denied
State v. Bass 767 So. 2d 772 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
App. 3 Cir.), writ denied, ), or to the State's failure to file the multiple bill within a reasonable time after conviction ( ).
Bolton v. Tulane University 755 So. 2d 1003 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
1 Cir.1989), writ denied
State v. Hancock 748 So. 2d 549 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
3 Cir.), unit denied, (delay of thirteen years unjustified by record); (La.App.
Williams v. City of Baton Rouge 731 So. 2d 240 La. 1999
1 Cir.), writ denied, (La.
Jeansonne v. American Native Const. 710 So. 2d 306 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
1 Cir.1989), writ denied, the first circuit interpreted "future compensation' to mean any compensation benefits which became payable after the compromise."
Johnson v. Star Enterprises 704 So. 2d 857 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
1 Cir.1989), writ denied, Darbonne, supra.
Darbonne v. M&M Right of Way Contractors 693 So. 2d 299 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
1 Cir.1989), writ denied
HOUSTON GEN. INS. v. Commercial Union Ins. 682 So. 2d 1341 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
1st Cir.), writ denied, there has been discussion of issues very similar to the one presented in the instant case.
State v. Dorsey 672 So. 2d 188 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
3rd Cir.), writ denied, this court held that a delay between entry of a plea of guilty and sentencing of thirteen years was unreasonable.
LeCroy v. Brand Scaffold Bldg., Inc. 672 So. 2d 181 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Seal v. Bogalusa Community Medical Center 665 So. 2d 52 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
1st Cir.), writ denied, (1989).
Prevost v. Jobbers Oil Transport Co. 665 So. 2d 400 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
1st Cir.1988), writ denied, (La.
Coolman v. Global Torque Turn, Inc. 631 So. 2d 106 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
1st Cir.1989), writ denied, citing W. Malone & A. Johnson, 14 Louisiana Civil Law Treatise, Worker's Compensation Law and Practice, § 373 (2d ed. Supp.1988)), it is clear that the law contemplates employer and insurer written approval of both pre-suit and post-suit compromises.
Jackson v. AL & W. MOORE TRUCKING 609 So. 2d 1064 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
1st Cir.1989), writ denied the victim of an auto accident was conscious and in great pain for 35 to 45 minutes prior to death.
Martin v. Francis 600 So. 2d 1382 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
1st Cir.), writ denied, (1989).
Sunlake Apartment Residents v. Tonti Development Corp. 602 So. 2d 22 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
See Snell v. United Parcel Services, Inc., (1st Cir.1989), writ denied ; Anderson Estate v. Charity Hosp.
State v. McCoy 586 So. 2d 697 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
3rd Cir.), writ denied, this court held that a delay between entry of a plea of guilty and sentencing of thirteen years was unreasonable.
Spataro v. STATE, DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETY & CORR. 577 So. 2d 795 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
3d Cir.1989), writ denied (delay of 13 years between guilty plea and sentence was unreasonable absent justifying factors).
Hampton v. Rubicon Chemicals, Inc. 579 So. 2d 458 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Faught v. Ryder/PIE Nationwide, Inc. 577 So. 2d 198 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
1st Cir.), writ denied, (Faught I).
Durham Pontiac-Cadillac-GMC Trucks, Inc. v. Phillips 572 So. 2d 1080 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
1st Cir.), writ denied (limiting the language “future compensation” to those benefits payable after the date of settlement).
Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. v. Hanover Ins. Co. 569 So. 2d 1078 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
1st Cir.), writ denied, (1989), the First Circuit observed: "Additionally, we note that our interpretation is not inequitable inasmuch as the employer's right to recover from the tort-feasor is not prejudiced by the settlement.
Hanover Ins. Co. v. Allstate Ins. Co. 554 So. 2d 1261 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
1st Cir.), writ denied, (limiting the language "future compensation" to those benefits payable after the date of settlement).

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by