Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Penalber v. Blount, 550 So. 2d 577.

353 citing documents.

Istre v. Meche 916 So. 2d 307 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Smith v. Our Lady of the Lake Hosp., Inc., 93-2512, p. 27 (La.7/5/94)
Russell Paulette Lebouef Istre v. Daniel Meche La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Michael Joseph Viator v. Wendell R. Miller, Indiv. as in His Capacity as Judge for the 31st Judidical … La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Even if we were to conclude a de facto attorney-client relationship existed between Miller and Michael’s ex-wife, (La.
Viator v. Miller 900 So. 2d 1135 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Even if we were to conclude a de facto attorney-client relationship existed between Miller and Michael's ex-wife, "no cause of action lies in favor of a non-client under theories of malpractice and negligence because the attorney owes no duty to the adversary of his client."
Jarrell v. Travis 906 So. 2d 551 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
Lyon Financial Services, Inc., D/B/A the Manifest Group v. McRae Ford, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Lyon Financial Services, Inc. v. McRae Ford, Inc. 876 So. 2d 951 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Broadscape. Com, Inc. v. Walker 866 So. 2d 1085 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
Lebovitz v. Sheraton Operating Corp. 868 So. 2d 164 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Inc., 93-2512 (La.7/5/94), ; Jefferson Parish School Bd.
Pritchard v. AMERICAN FREIGHTWAYS CORP. 862 So. 2d 476 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
Mauberret-Lavie v. Lavie 850 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
Wood v. Becnel 840 So. 2d 1225 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Alexis v. Alton Ochsner Foundation Hospital 869 So. 2d 121 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Trigg v. PENNINGTON OIL CO., INC. 835 So. 2d 845 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Butler v. Re/Max New Orleans Properties, Inc. 828 So. 2d 43 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Ackel v. Academy Louisiana Co. 821 So. 2d 109 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Summary Judgment is not appropriate for determinations of subjective facts like good faith, intent, .
Stokes v. Oster Development, Inc. 807 So. 2d 987 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
Gray v. Cannon 807 So. 2d 924 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Smith, 639 So.2d at 751 ; Bauer v. Dyer, 00-1778, at 13 (La.App.
Willis v. Royal Imports, Inc. 807 So. 2d 953 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Smith, 639 So.2d at 751 ; Bauer v. Dyer, 00-1778, at 13 (La.App.
Elmwood MRI, Ltd. v. PARACELSUS PIONEER VALLEY HOSPITAL, INC. 806 So. 2d 743 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
Carr v. Union Pacific Railroad 803 So. 2d 427 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Smith, 639 So.2d at 751 ; Bauer v. Dyer, 00-1778, at 13 (La.App.
Hardy v. EASY TV & APPLIANCES OF LOUISIANA, INC. 804 So. 2d 777 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
Rogers v. Ash Grove Cement Co. 799 So. 2d 841 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
the Montalvo court stated: Intentionally tortious actions, ostensibly performed for a client's benefit, will not shroud an attorney with immunity.
Parker v. Harper 803 So. 2d 76 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
Bank of New York v. Williams 796 So. 2d 69 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Inc., 93-2512 (La.7/5/94)
Bauer v. Dyer 782 So. 2d 1133 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
Carrier v. Grey Wolf Drilling Co. 776 So. 2d 439 La. 2001
Beard v. Grey Wolf Drilling Co. 774 So. 2d 287 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
Coto v. J. RAY McDERMOTT, SA 772 So. 2d 828 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
Gorum v. Optimist Club of Glenmora 771 So. 2d 690 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
Walker v. ACADIAN BUILDERS OF GONZALES 797 So. 2d 690 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Town of Mamou v. Fontenot 756 So. 2d 719 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
(holding that summary judgment is rarely appropriate for a determination based on subjective facts such as intent).
Gagliano v. Gosling 768 So. 2d 47 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Penalber v. Blount, 89-C-1071
Slaid v. Evergreen Indem., Ltd. 745 So. 2d 793 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
Wilson, supra ; Viator v. P & A Well Service, Inc., (La.
Thompson v. Harrington 746 So. 2d 652 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
for the proposition that an attorney may be liable to third persons for malpractice if he exceeds the limits of his agency, engages in intentional or fraudulent conduct, or breaches a fiduciary duty.
Hardy v. Bowie 744 So. 2d 606 La. 1999
Inc., 93-2512 (La.7/5/94)
Taylor v. Rowell 736 So. 2d 812 La. 1999
art. 966(B); Potter v. First Federal S & L
Henican v. Hackett 734 So. 2d 884 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
However, and Montalvo v. Sondes, 93-2813 (La.5/23/94), , which prohibits a plaintiffs suit against his adversary’s attorney until after termination of the underlying suit in favor of the plaintiff.
DESIRE NARCOTICS REHAB. CENTER v. White 732 So. 2d 144 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
the Supreme Court, in the course of holding that an attorney cannot be sued for negligence or malpractice by his client's adversary in a lawsuit, distinguished the situation of a non-client third-party beneficiary and, in that connection, cited Killingsworth.
Leger v. LOUISIANA MEDICAL MUT. INS. CO. 732 So. 2d 654 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
Broussard v. FA Richard & Associates, Inc. 732 So. 2d 578 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
the Louisiana Supreme Court indicated that an attorney may not owe any duty to a non-client in a negligence action.
Milling, Benson, Woodward, Hillyer, Pierson & Miller L.L.P. v. American Marine Holding Co. 729 So. 2d 139 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Montalvo v. Sondes, 93-2813 (La.5/23/94), .
Dyer v. Service Marine Industries, Inc. 723 So. 2d 1135 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Kidd v. Logan M. Killen, Inc., 640 So.2d at 619 .
Rambo v. Walker 722 So. 2d 86 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Miramon v. Woods, 25,850, p. 10 (La.App.
Shepard v. Bradford 721 So. 2d 1049 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Tolbert v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co. 719 So. 2d 738 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
Price v. City of Slidell 723 So. 2d 455 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Marceaux v. State 720 So. 2d 29 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Charlet v. Legislature of State 713 So. 2d 1199 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Arledge v. Hendricks 715 So. 2d 135 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
the Montalvo court stated: Intentionally tortious actions, ostensibly performed for a client's benefit, will not shroud an attorney with immunity.