Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Palermo Land Co. v. Planning Com'n of Calcasieu Parish, 561 So. 2d 482.

86 citing documents.

Monte v. Parish of Jefferson ex rel. Coulon 898 So. 2d 506 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
Fishbein v. STATE EX REL. LSU 887 So. 2d 56 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Palermo Land Co., Inc. v. Planning *65 Com'n of Calcasieu Parish
Fishbein v. State ex rel. Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center 887 So. 2d 56 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Palermo Land Co., Inc. v. Planning *65 Com’n of Calcasieu Parish
TSC, INC. v. Bossier Parish Police Jury 878 So. 2d 880 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
The law governing review of a -492 (La.1990) as follows: Zoning is a legislative function.
Bernard v. Parish of Jefferson 874 So. 2d 406 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
A similar argument was made and rejected in Palermo Land Co.
Boudreaux v. Braun Investments, L.L.C. 869 So. 2d 180 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Civil Service Commission of City of New Orleans v. City of New Orleans 839 So. 2d 196 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Resort to equitable considerations and estoppel is not permitted “when in conflict with positive written law.” Morris v. Friedman, 94-2808, p. 10 (La.11/27/95), (quoting Palermo Land Co. v. Planning Comm’n of Calcasieu Par *203 ish, ).
MAYNARD BATTURE VENT. v. Parish of Jefferson 786 So. 2d 757 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
DISCUSSION In Palermo Land Co., the Louisiana Supreme Court held that a challenge to a zoning decision in Louisiana is a de novo proceeding in which the issue is whether the result of the existing zoning legislation is arbitrary and capricious.
LA. HAND & UPPER EXTREMITY INSTITUTE OF INC. v. City of Shreveport 781 So. 2d 695 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
Church v. St. Charles Parish 767 So. 2d 913 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
King v. Caddo Parish Com’n, 97-1873 (La.1998), ; Palermo Land Co. v. Planning Com’n of Calcasieu Parish, State ex rel Civello v. City of New Orleans, 154 La.
LaSalle v. Iberia Parish Council 741 So. 2d 812 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
See Palermo Land Co., Inc. v. Planning Com’n of Calcasieu Parish, See also Bourbon Country Estates, Inc. v. St.
AL'S TRUCKING v. State Farm Fire & Cas. 735 So. 2d 833 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
In Palermo Land Co., our supreme court reiterated the analysis of preemption of local regulation by state law.
Cenac v. Hart 741 So. 2d 690 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
See, (`Equitable considerations and estoppel cannot be permitted to prevail when in conflict with the positive written law.'); Packard Florida Motors Co. v. Malone, 208 La.
King v. Caddo Parish Com'n 719 So. 2d 410 La. 1998
Bailey v. Parish of Caddo 716 So. 2d 523 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
Papa v. City of Shreveport, supra .
PALM-AIR CIVIC ASS'N v. Syncor Intern., Corp. 709 So. 2d 258 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
River Birch, Inc. v. Jefferson Parish Zoning Appeals Board 669 So. 2d 5 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
regulations list uses of property in U-l district which “shall be permitted only with the approval of the Jefferson Parish Council.” Specifically, Zoning Ordinance § XVII 2(L) requires the approval of the Council for “all uses which may be offensive or obnoxious by reason of emission of odor, dust, smoke, gas, excessive glare, light or noise or vibration.” In Palermo Land Co. v. Planning Comm’n, the Louisiana Supreme Court, in a footnote, noted that “‘it does not take an expert to establish that
Commercial Nat. Bank v. Rowe 666 So. 2d 1312 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
Morris v. Friedman 663 So. 2d 19 La. 1995
See, ("Equitable considerations and estoppel cannot be permitted to prevail when in conflict with the positive written law."); Packard Florida Motors Co. v. Malone, 208 La.
Papa v. City of Shreveport 661 So. 2d 1100 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
City of Baton Rouge v. Ross 654 So. 2d 1311 La. 1995
Guillot v. Brooks 651 So. 2d 345 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
Hildebrand, supra ; cf. Wis.
Cerruti v. Parish of Jefferson 650 So. 2d 315 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
In Palermo Land Co., v. Planning Commission of Calcasieu Parish, the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that all legislative acts are presumed to be valid and the burden rests on the person challenging the act to overcome the presumption.
St. Charles Gaming v. Riverboat Gaming 648 So. 2d 1310 La. 1995
McElveen v. Vernon Parish Police Jury 630 So. 2d 777 La. 1994
Houston Fishing Tools v. Windham 619 So. 2d 1224 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Bourbon Country Estates, Inc. v. St. James Parish 611 So. 2d 180 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
Stated differently, the question is whether a decision by the governing authority bears so little relation to public health, safety or welfare as to render it arbitrary and capricious
AMERICAN WASTE AND POLLUTION CONTROL CO v. St. Martin Parish Police Jury 609 So. 2d 201 La. 1992
[3] Palermo Land Co., cited by St.
Save Our Wetlands, Inc. v. St. John Baptist Parish 600 So. 2d 790 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
the Supreme Court of Louisiana clearly stated the courts’ role in zoning cases.
Lakeshore Harbor Condo. Dev. v. City of New Orleans 603 So. 2d 192 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
Palermo Land Co., Four States Realty Co.
LaBove v. Theriot 597 So. 2d 1007 La. 1992
Because the effect of applying the equitable remedy of estoppel in this case would be to negate the specific statutory limitation for urging this peremptory exception, we are *1012 precluded from doing so, La.Code Civ.Pro., art. 4; Palermo Land Co.
Save Our Neighborhoods v. St. John the Baptist Parish 592 So. 2d 908 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1991
the Supreme Court undertook a very thorough consideration of Louisiana zoning law, in particular rezoning decisions.
Parish of Jefferson v. Chamel 591 So. 2d 796 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
The Supreme Court in the recent case of Palermo Land Co. v. Planning Com’n, held that, “Whenever the propriety of a zoning decision is debatable, it will be upheld....” [Citations omitted.]
Robbins Tire & Rubber v. Winnfield Retread 577 So. 2d 1189 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
Art. 4; [1] writ denied, La.
Desormeaux Ent. v. Village of Mermentau 568 So. 2d 213 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
In Palermo Land Co., Inc. & Browning Ferris, Inc. v. Planning Commission of Calcasieu Parish & The Police Jury of Calcasieu Parish et al., (La.
Bayou Self Road Development v. Jefferson Parish Council 567 So. 2d 679 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Palermo Land Co. v. Planning Com’n