Carey v. UMC
Also decided on this docket: La., December 8, 1989 553 So. 2d 472
Carey v. UMC, 553 So. 2d 472 (La. 1989).
Cited by
- Lori Bernier v. St. Tammany Parish School Board, Melissa Schoegel, individually and on behalf … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2025
- Michael M. Mulkey, Sr. v. Century Indemnity Company, Petroleum Casualty Company, James Ralph Vannoy, … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
- Cador v. Deep South Equipment Co. 166 So. 3d 344 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
- Tommie Hebert and Melissa Anne Hebert v. J. Oran Richard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
- Bergeron v. Murphy Oil, U.S.A., Inc. 903 So. 2d 496 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
- Jones v. Tezeno 758 So. 2d 896 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
- Barrino v. E. BATON ROUGE SCHOOL BD. 697 So. 2d 27 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
- Bridges v. Carl E. Woodward, Inc. 663 So. 2d 458 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
- Landry v. Uniroyal Chemical Co., Inc. 653 So. 2d 1199 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
- McKee v. Inspectorate America Corp. 636 So. 2d 305 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
- Esteve v. Huntsinger 630 So. 2d 312 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
- Trahan v. Trans-Louisiana Gas Co., Inc. 618 So. 2d 30 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc. 444 So. 2d 618
Opinion text
553 So.2d 472 (1989) Byron CAREY v. UMC (UNITED MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS), et al. No. 89-C-2616. Supreme Court of Louisiana. December 8, 1989. Writ granted. The judgments of the district and court of appeal granting UMC's exception of no cause of action are reversed. Plaintiff's petition asserts that defendants intended to injure him or knew or should have known that his injury was substantially certain to follow. Conditions of the mind such as malice, knowledge, and intent may be alleged generally. La.C.C.P. art. 856. Furthermore, the purpose of the exception of no cause of action is to determine the sufficiency of the petition and is triable on the face of the papers. Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc., 444 So.2d 618 (La. 1984). The merit of plaintiff's claim is to be determined after findings of fact upon motion for summary judgment or trial on the merits.