Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Rodrigue v. LeGros, 563 So. 2d 248.

19 citing documents.

Universal Services and Associates, LLC v. Wade Grundmeyer, Val Coerver, Tauber Oil Company, Tauber Petrochemical Co., Chad Verhoff … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
App. 4 Cir. 5/12/21), ---So.3d ----, 2021 WL 1917784, * 2 ( (La.
Elray and Brenda Lege v. Union Carbide Corporation La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2021
Additionally, appellate courts “generally do not grant rehearings to consider issues raised for the first time in the application for rehearing.” (La.
Perry Lanclos v. Crown Dbl, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
The court identified the differences in the relationships and bargaining power of a contractor vis-a-vis its insurer and a contractor vis-a-vis an operator, then reiterated the purpose of the LOIA: the “purpose of the legislature [sic], and thus the policy interest of the state, is to protect certain contractors, namely those in oilfields, from being forced through indemnity provisions to bear the risk of their principals’ negligence.
Giorgio v. Alliance Operating Corp. 921 So. 2d 58 La. 2006
Wall v. Calcasieu Parish Police Jury 833 So. 2d 528 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
Lyons v. Pool Co. of Texas 781 So. 2d 569 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Rodrigue v. LeGros, 89-2828 p. 4 (La.6/4/90); .
Palmour v. Gray Ins. Co. 731 So. 2d 911 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
Ridings v. Danos & Curole Marine Contractors, Inc. 723 So. 2d 979 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
(maritime law, rather than LOAIA, governed indemnity provisions of maritime contract "absent a valid choice of law clause").
Lejano v. Bandak 705 So. 2d 158 La. 1998
Green v. Industrial Helicopters, Inc.
Fontenot v. Chevron USA Inc. 676 So. 2d 557 La. 1996
*563 the "purpose of the legislature [sic], and thus the policy interest of the state, is to protect certain contractors, namely those in oilfields, from being forced through indemnity provisions to bear the risk of their principals' negligence....
Fontenot v. Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. 655 So. 2d 758 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Alleman v. Brownie Drilling Co. 647 So. 2d 371 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Lewis v. Diamond Services Corp. 637 So. 2d 825 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
9:2780 A. The purpose of the legislation and the policy interest of the state, is to protect certain contractors, namely those in oilfields, from being forced through indemnity provisions to bear the risk of their principals' negligence.
Fox v. Southern Scrap Export Co., Ltd. 618 So. 2d 844 La. 1993
1590 , 36 L.Ed.2d 280 (1973); Green v. Industrial Helicopters, Inc.
Daigle v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance Co. 610 So. 2d 883 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
9:2780 A. Stated more simply, the purpose of the legislation and the policy interest of the state, is to protect certain contractors, namely those in oilfields, from being forced through indemnity provisions to bear the risk of their principals’ negligence.
Daigle v. US FIDELITY AND GUAR. INS. CO. 610 So. 2d 883 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
9:2780 A. Stated more simply, the purpose of the legislation and the policy interest of the state, is to protect certain contractors, namely those in oilfields, from being forced through indemnity provisions to bear the risk of their principals' negligence.
Thomas v. B.J. Titan Servs. Co. 595 So. 2d 1275 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Green v. Industrial Helicopters, Inc. 593 So. 2d 634 La. 1992
U.S. Const. art. III, section 2
Perkins v. Rubicon, Inc. 563 So. 2d 258 La. 1990
We granted certiorari in this case, because the case presents a

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by