Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Diefenthal v. Longue Vue Management Corp., 561 So. 2d 44.

28 citing documents.

Jesse Justin Colvin and Ruby Sue Hill Colvin v. Robert Bradford Jones and Roni Michelle Reppond Jones Consolidated … La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2026
Laforge v. State ex rel. Division of Administration 88 So. 3d 1183 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Court has since consistently held that building restrictions “constitute real rights, not personal to the vendor, and inure to the benefit of all other grantees under a general plan of development, and are real rights running with the land; and that the remedy of the other grantees to prevent a violation of the restrictions by another is by injunction.” Oakbrook Civic Ass’n, (1986).
Proctor's Landing Property Owners Ass'n v. Leopold 83 So. 3d 1199 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Civil Code art. 3464 sets out the applicable rule on interruption, and states: “Prescription is interrupted when one acknowledges the right of the person against whom he had commenced to prescribe.” Walters v. Besse, 94-67, p. 3 (La.App.
Atkins v. Six C Properties, L.L.C. 55 So. 3d 120 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
See also, Rodrigue v. Copeland, supra.
Cathcart v. Morace 10 So. 3d 894 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Parish of East Feliciana v. Guidry 923 So. 2d 45 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
Diefenthal v. Longue Vue Management Corp. (La.
Alonzo v. State & Department of Natural Resources 900 So. 2d 1111 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
Diefenthal v. Long Vue Manage *1114 ment Corp.
Moseley v. Mustin 880 So. 2d 105 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
Kenneth Perry v. Perry & Sons Vault & Grave Service La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Perry v. Perry & Sons Vault & Grave Service 872 So. 2d 611 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Tri-State Sand & Gravel, LLC v. Cox 871 So. 2d 1253 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
Oakbrook Civic Ass'n, (1986).
Diefenthal v. Longue Vue Foundation 865 So. 2d 863 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
Vignette Publications, Inc. v. Harborview Enterprises, Inc. 799 So. 2d 531 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
art.2047; Bartlett Const. Co., Inc. v. St.
WHITAKER CONST. CO. INC. v. Larkin Dev. Corp. 775 So. 2d 571 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
Comeaux v. CF Bean Corp. 750 So. 2d 291 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
Audubon Trace Condominium Ass'n v. Smith 722 So. 2d 1114 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
footnote 9: Building restrictions are incorporeal immov-ables and real rights likened to predial servi-tudes.
Lankford v. Koch Gateway Pipeline Co. 713 So. 2d 464 La. 1998
Corp., (parol evidence admissible to resolve ambiguity).
Brier Lake, Inc. v. Jones 710 So. 2d 1054 La. 1998
Walters v. Besse 643 So. 2d 398 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
the Supreme Court specifically addressed interruption of the two year prescription of the right to enforce certain building restrictions.
Rogers v. Daigle 643 So. 2d 758 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Bond v. Allemand 632 So. 2d 326 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Liljeberg Enterprises, Inc. v. LIFEMARK HOSP. OF LA., INC. 620 So. 2d 1331 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
Lantier v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. 614 So. 2d 1346 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Danna v. Barq's, Inc. 612 So. 2d 253 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
PREMIER BANK, NAT. ASS'N v. Prevost Motors, Inc. 597 So. 2d 1136 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Succession of Doll v. Doll 593 So. 2d 1239 La. 1992
Billingsley v. Bach Energy Corp. 588 So. 2d 786 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
Dixie Campers, Inc. v. Vesely Company, supra .
Byles Welding & Tractor v. Butts Sales 578 So. 2d 246 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
the Supreme Court discussed a similar situation to that in Sewell .

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by