Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Dobson v. Louisiana Power & Light Co., 567 So. 2d 569.

48 citing documents.

Jared Arthur Cunningham v. Borden Dairy Company of Texas, LLC, Dairy Farmers of America, Inc., Entergy Louisiana, LLC … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
Christine Perrin v. Ochsner Baptist Medical Center, LLC, and Abc Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2019
1/17/07), (citing Dobson v. Louisiana Power & Light Co., (La.
Abby Gail Garcie v. City of Natchitoches La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
Ann Welch v. State of La., Dotd La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Dobson v. Louisiana Power & Light Co.
Detraz v. Lee 950 So. 2d 557 La. 2007
(citing Restatement (Second) of Torts, § 282 (1965)).
Foley v. Entergy Louisiana, Inc. 946 So. 2d 144 La. 2006
Foley v. Entergy Louisiana, Inc. 925 So. 2d 638 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
This likewise was recognized by the trial court when it pointed out that the facts and circumstances of Dobson v. LP & L, bear a notable resemblance to the present matter.
Benjamin ex rel. Benjamin v. Housing Authority 871 So. 2d 1208 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
2 Cir. 5/7/99), , citing Dobson v. Louisiana Power & Light Company
Vermilion Parish Police Jury v. Tim Albert La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Vermilion Parish Police Jury v. Albert 867 So. 2d 67 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Hayes v. Entergy Corp. 850 So. 2d 916 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
Nigreville v. Federated Rural Elec.
Myers v. Dronet 801 So. 2d 1097 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
Stewart v. Wilkerson 773 So. 2d 160 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Kendall v. WEINGARTEN REALTY MGMT. CO. 769 So. 2d 171 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
Morrison v. Kappa Alpha Psi Fraternity 738 So. 2d 1105 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
Dobson v. Louisiana Power & Light Company
Castille v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 731 So. 2d 904 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Dobson v. Louisiana Power & Light Co.
Marcev v. Allstate Insurance Co. 697 So. 2d 353 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Dobson v. Louisiana Power & Light Co.
Warren v. Campagna 686 So. 2d 969 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
Delaune v. Medical Ctr. of Baton Rouge 683 So. 2d 859 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
1st Cir.1989), aff'd in part, amended in part, .
Oxley v. Sabine River Authority 663 So. 2d 497 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Electric calls this court's attention to Dobson v. Louisiana Power & Light Co.
McAdams v. La. Power & Light Co. 659 So. 2d 820 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
This charge is taken from Dobson v. Louisiana Power & Light Co., which describes the statement as "the `Hand formula,' the `Learned Hand test' or the `risk-benefit' balancing test."
Donaldson v. Sanders 661 So. 2d 1010 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Dobson v. Louisiana Power & Light Co.
Pitre v. Louisiana Tech University 655 So. 2d 659 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
DeStevens v. Harsco Corp. 652 So. 2d 1054 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
See generally Dobson v. Louisiana Power & Light Co., )
Brooks v. Henson Fashion Floors, Inc. 647 So. 2d 440 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
Cir.1940); reh'g denied.
Maeder v. Williams 652 So. 2d 1005 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
Nigreville v. Federated Rural Elec. Ins. Co. 642 So. 2d 216 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Membership Co-op., Dobson v. Louisiana Power & Light Company, (La.
State in Interest of AC 643 So. 2d 719 La. 1994
Frelow v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. 631 So. 2d 632 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Dobson v. Louisiana Power & Light Co., (La.
Raney v. Walter O. Moss Regional Hosp. 629 So. 2d 485 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Dobson v. Louisiana Power & Light Co.
Crooks v. National Union Fire Ins. Co. 620 So. 2d 421 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Dobson v. Louisiana Power & Light Co.
Weaver v. Valley Elec. Membership Corp. 615 So. 2d 1375 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
The standard is jurisprudentially derived from Dobson v. Louisiana Power & Light Co., (La.
Blair v. Tynes 610 So. 2d 956 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
In assessing the percentage of fault of Tynes, Blair, and Hillhouse, we are guided by the dictates of our supreme court in Dobson v. Louisiana Power & Light Company
Davis v. Louisiana Power & Light Co. 612 So. 2d 235 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
In Dobson v. Louisiana Power & Light Co., the Supreme Court of Louisiana defined the duty of one who works around electrical lines: ...
Grow v. Transocean Contractors, Inc. 610 So. 2d 830 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Dominici v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 606 So. 2d 555 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
Smith v. State Through Dept. of Public Safety 620 So. 2d 1172 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Graves v. Lou Ana Foods, Inc. 604 So. 2d 150 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
In Dobson v. Louisiana Power & Light Co., the Supreme Court stated: "The generally accepted view is that negligence is defined as conduct which falls below the standard established by law for the protection of others against an unreasonable risk of harm.
State v. King 602 So. 2d 121 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
Fannin v. Louisiana Power & Light Co. 594 So. 2d 1119 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
The Louisiana Supreme Court and this Court have recently set forth the law with regard to electrical accidents in Dobson v. Louisiana Power & Light Co., Levi v. S.W.
Clark v. Ark-La-Tex Auction, Inc. 593 So. 2d 870 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
Radcliffe v. Haun 593 So. 2d 824 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
4th Cir.1983) than to the situations in Washington v. Louisiana Power and Light, supra and Wright v. U.S. Gypsum Company, supra.
Williams v. Louisiana Power & Light Co. 590 So. 2d 786 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1991
The pertinent instructions were taken verbatim from the two leading cases on electrical accidents, (La.
Putman v. Gulf States Utilities 588 So. 2d 1223 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
In this factual posture, Putman’s as follows: Any person is required by law to recognize that his conduct involves a risk of causing harm to himself if a reasonable person would do so while exercising such attention, perception of the circumstances, memory, knowledge of other pertinent matters, intelligence and judgment as a reasonable
Fanguy v. Dupre Bros. Const. Co., Inc. 588 So. 2d 1251 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Likewise, with regard to the percentage of fault assessed to the plaintiff by the trial court, and mindful of the guidelines discussed by *1259 our Supreme Court in comparing the relative degrees of fault to be assigned to each party in Dobson v. Louisiana Power and Light Company, [8] we affirm the district court's conclusion that the negligence of Fracella and Dupre was greater than that of Mr. Fanguy.
Socorro v. City of New Orleans 579 So. 2d 931 La. 1991
Barnes v. Thames 578 So. 2d 1155 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Restatement (Second) of Torts, § 282 (1965); Harper, James & Gray, The Law of Torts, § 16.1 at 381-382 (1986); Prosser & Keeton on Torts, § 31 (5th ed. 1984).
Brantley v. General Motors Corp. 573 So. 2d 1288 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
The criteria set forth in Watson ( by which relative fault of the parties is to be evaluated are: 1.