Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite In Re Medical Review Panel of Howard, 573 So. 2d 472.

43 citing documents.

Karen May,et Al. v. the Succession of Mayo Romero La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
State of La, Admin Div,office of Community Develop, Disaster Recov v. Wallace L. Styron Kristy B. Styron La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
N. G. v. A. C. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
John Mantiply and Melissa Sue Mantiply v. Joseph I. Hoffman, Jr., M.D. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
Mantiply v. Hoffman 263 So. 3d 1193 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
Lapuyade v. Rawbar, Inc. 190 So. 3d 1214 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Raborn v. Albea 144 So. 3d 1066 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Watters v. Department of Social Services 102 So. 3d 118 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Barbe v. American Sugar Refining, Inc. 83 So. 3d 75 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Cordova v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
Becker v. Murphy Oil Corp. 70 So. 3d 885 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Cordova v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
Marin v. Exxon Mobil Corp. 48 So. 3d 234 La. 2010
astin v. Entergy Corp., 03-1030 (La.2/6/04), n. 4 , in applying the discovery rule in non-medical malpractice cases, there is a distinction from how that rule is applied in medical malpractice cases: We distinguish the instant case from those in which the doctrine has traditionally applied: those cases involving medical malpractice actions (In Re: Medical Review Panel of Howard, Branch v. Willis-Knighton Medical Center, 92-3086 (La.4/28/94), (Prescriptive period did not commence until plaintiffs
Guillot v. Daimlerchrysler Corp. 50 So. 3d 173 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Cordova v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
Doe v. DELTA WOMEN'S CLINIC OF BATON ROUGE 37 So. 3d 1076 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Glenn M. Hebert v. J. Elise Shelton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Hebert v. Shelton 11 So. 3d 1197 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Zoulek v. PIP America 2 So. 3d 511 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
In Re Jenkins 945 So. 2d 814 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
Eastin v. Entergy Corp. 865 So. 2d 49 La. 2004
[4] We distinguish the instant case from those in which the doctrine has traditionally been applied: those cases involving medical malpractice actions ( In Re: Medical Review Panel of Howard, Branch v. Willis-Knighton Medical Center, 92-3086 (La.4/28/94), [Prescriptive period did not commence until plaintiffs discovered the damage, the delict and their relationship, when disease was diagnosed]); long-latency diseases ( Brown v. R.J.
Ducote v. Touro Infirmary 860 So. 2d 125 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
ine [of contra non va-lentem] itself is based on the theory that when the claimant is not aware of the facts giving rise to his or her cause of action against the particular defendant, the running of prescription is for that reason suspended until the tort victim discovers |fior should have discovered the facts upon which his or her cause of action is based.”
Williams v. Holiday Inn Worldwide 816 So. 2d 998 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
Young v. First National Bank of Shreveport 794 So. 2d 128 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
Velez v. Carbonett 779 So. 2d 12 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Acosta v. Campbell 744 So. 2d 112 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
Asbestos v. Bordelon, Inc. 726 So. 2d 926 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
4 Cir. 5/8/96) , , writ denied, 96-1799 (La.10/25/96), ; citing
Simmons v. Templeton 723 So. 2d 1009 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
Webb v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Louisiana 711 So. 2d 788 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
National Union v. Spillars, 552 So.2d at 630 .
Webb v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of La. 711 So. 2d 788 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
[12] National Union v. Spillars, 552 So.2d at 630 .
Kavanaugh v. Long 698 So. 2d 730 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
Hoerner v. Wesley-Jensen 684 So. 2d 508 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
Brumfield v. Avondale Industries, Inc. 674 So. 2d 1159 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Tichenor v. Roman Catholic Church 665 So. 2d 1307 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
Wimberly, supra at 212 ; (La.
Leach v. Alonso 663 So. 2d 344 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Terrebonne v. Theriot 657 So. 2d 1358 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
White v. West Carroll Hospital, Inc., (1992); (1991).
Miley v. Consolidated Gravity Drainage Dist. No. 1 642 So. 2d 693 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Wimberly v. Gatch 635 So. 2d 206 La. 1994
Burdeaux v. Cline 626 So. 2d 1205 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
White v. West Carroll Hospital, Inc.
Kilpatrick v. Kilpatrick 625 So. 2d 222 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
Cole v. Celotex Corp. 620 So. 2d 1154 La. 1993
Knippers v. Lambard 620 So. 2d 1368 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
Chandarlis v. Shah, supra ; Maung-U v. May, supra
White v. West Carroll Hosp., Inc. 613 So. 2d 150 La. 1992
Tilley v. Kennedy 605 So. 2d 226 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
Baum v. Cato 599 So. 2d 909 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
Matherne v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 599 So. 2d 816 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992