Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Stuka v. Fleming, 561 So. 2d 1371.

74 citing documents.

In Re: Medical Review Panel Proceedings for the Claim of Jack Edward Price, II (D) La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
Patricia Goff and Mark Goff v. Dr. Robin L. Yue La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
15 The supreme court, (emphasis in original) (footnote omitted), stated: The Medical Malpractice Act, enacted by La.
Toston v. St. Francis Medical Center, Inc. 178 So. 3d 1084 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
Willis v. Ochsner Clinic Foundation 140 So. 3d 338 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Cannatella v. Cougle 119 So. 3d 94 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Stratmann v. Cardiovascular Specialists, Inc. 65 So. 3d 244 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
stating: The Medical Malpractice Act, enacted by La.
Cubley v. WILLIS-KNIGHTON MEDICAL CENTER 21 So. 3d 1000 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
Reed v. St. Charles General Hospital 11 So. 3d 1138 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
As noted in Williams v. Kushner, 549 So.2d at 296 (La.1989) the PCF “is not a negligent party and does not have the status of an Article 2315 defendant.” The Supreme Court later held that the Med Mai Act “contemplates that the issue of liability is generally to be determined between the malpractice victim and the health care provider, either by settlement or by trial, ...”
Flood v. PENDLETON MEMORIAL METHODIST HOSP. 989 So. 2d 809 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
Francis Cabrini Hospital, 94-2217 (La.4/10/95)
Miller v. Lammico 973 So. 2d 693 La. 2008
Jordan v. Willis-Knighton Medical Center 911 So. 2d 351 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
The third circuit concluded that the evidentiary ruling was correct and, to support its decision, cert.
Hanks v. Seale 904 So. 2d 662 La. 2005
No. 2, 95-2799, p. 1 (La.1/26/96), (per curiam); Thomas v. Insurance Corp. Of America, 93-1856, p. 4 (La.2/28/94), 633 * Felix v. St.
Adam Ceasar Sr. v. Dr. Richard J. Barry La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Ceasar v. Barry 894 So. 2d 571 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
Yong Turner v. Southwest Louisiana Hospital Assoc La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
Turner v. Southwest Louisiana Hosp. Ass'n 856 So. 2d 1237 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
Posey v. Singletary 855 So. 2d 853 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
Roberson v. Arcadia Healthcare Center, Inc. 850 So. 2d 1059 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
See Russo v. Vasquez, 94-2407 (La.1/17/95), ; cert.
Hall v. Brookshire Bros., Ltd. 848 So. 2d 559 La. 2003
Francis Cabrini Hospital, 94-2217 (La.4/10/95), ; (La.
Ginn v. Woman's Hospital Foundation, Inc. 842 So. 2d 338 La. 2003
Therefore, as we have done in previous medical malpractice cases, see e.g., Russo v. Vasquez, 94-2407 (La.1/17/95), ; cert.
Harrison v. Smith 832 So. 2d 1064 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Graham v. Willis-Knighton Medical Center, 97-0188 (La.9/9/97), ; cert.
Coleman v. Deno 832 So. 2d 1016 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
McGrath v. Excel Home Care, Inc. 810 So. 2d 1283 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
Graham v. Willis-Knighton Medical Center, 97-0188 (La.9/9/97), ; cert.
St. Romain v. Luker 804 So. 2d 85 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Thoulion v. Jeanfreau 794 So. 2d 936 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
L/ succinctly explained: The Medical Malpractice Act, enacted by La.
Varnes v. Mortaji 788 So. 2d 1280 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Coleman v. Deno 787 So. 2d 446 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
Evans v. Nogues 775 So. 2d 471 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
The status of the PCF after a settlement between the plaintiff and the health care provider is more in the nature of a statutory intervenor rather than a cert.
Ceasar v. Barry 772 So. 2d 331 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
Judalet v. Kusalavage 762 So. 2d 1128 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
McPherson v. LAKE AREA MEDICAL CENTER 767 So. 2d 102 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
Batson v. South Louisiana Medical Center 750 So. 2d 949 La. 1999
In dicta, the court favorably discussed Justice Dennis' concurrence/ cert.
Johns v. Agrawal 748 So. 2d 514 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
40:1299.42 B(2) and 40:1299.44 *518 C(5), cert.
Potier v. Commissioner of Ins. 753 So. 2d 305 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Bridgers v. Southwest Louisiana Hospital Ass'n 746 So. 2d 731 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Remet v. Martin 737 So. 2d 124 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
to support their claim that the dismissal of Ms. Martin was proper under the circumstances.
Evans v. Nogues 726 So. 2d 1115 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
Thibodeaux v. Paradigm Ins. Co. 709 So. 2d 830 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Taylor v. Tulane University of Louisiana 699 So. 2d 1117 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
Graham v. Willis-Knighton Medical Center 699 So. 2d 365 La. 1997
Against that background, this court first construed Section 1299.44 C(5) cert.
Graham v. Burkett 690 So. 2d 883 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
rehearing denied, June 28, 1990, cert.
McCrory v. JEFFERSON PARISH HOSP. SERV. 686 So. 2d 1060 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
Bijou v. Alton Ochsner Medical Found. 679 So. 2d 893 La. 1996
Francis Cabrini Hospital, (La.
Gauthreaux v. Trosclair 676 So. 2d 213 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Pendleton v. Barrett 675 So. 2d 720 La. 1996
Wartell v. Woman's & Children's Hosp. 676 So. 2d 632 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
McDougal v. Blanch 672 So. 2d 398 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Horil v. Scheinhorn 663 So. 2d 697 La. 1995
Graham v. Willis-Knighton Medical Center 662 So. 2d 161 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
Turner v. Massiah 656 So. 2d 636 La. 1995
The court of appeal believed that the situation before us was anticipated in a cert.