DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Walker, 567 So. 2d 581.

13 citing documents.

  • State v. Taylor 247 So. 3d 1192 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
    State v Walker , , 586 (La.
  • State v. Gourgues 204 So. 3d 1051 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    round that- it was based on illegal evidence because to permit such a challenge would allow the accused in every case to ‘insist on a kind of preliminary trial to determine the competency and adequacy of the evidence before the grand jury* resulting in ‘interminable delay but addfing] nothing to the assurance of a fair trial.’ ’’ Gutweiler, pp. 16-17, 979 So.2d at 480-81 , (La.
  • State v. Barthelemy 32 So. 3d 999 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
  • State v. Gutweiler 979 So. 2d 469 La. 2008
  • STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS AMANDA GUTWEILER AKA AMANDA HYPES La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    (providing that a defendant generally has no right to challenge an indictment for illegality of evidence; harmless-error analysis is used in determining whether to quash an indictment based on prosecutorial misconduct before the grand jury).
  • State v. Gutweiler 940 So. 2d 160 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    (providing that a defendant generally has no right to challenge *166 an indictment for illegality of evidence; harmless-error analysis is used in determining whether to quash an indictment based on prosecutorial misconduct before the grand jury).
  • State of Louisiana v. Robert S. Willis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
  • State v. Willis 915 So. 2d 365 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
  • State v. Lee 778 So. 2d 656 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    in denying the defendant’s motion.
  • State v. Dozier 713 So. 2d 729 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
    a case involving pre-indictment prosecutorial misconduct, the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: To warrant dismissal of an indictment the prosecutorial misconduct must be of such a nature as to mislead or unfairly affect the integrity of the grand jury as an independent and unbiased body.
  • State v. Delcambre 710 So. 2d 846 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    the supreme court discussed a similar issue.
  • State v. Wilson 679 So. 2d 963 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
  • State v. Fontenot 616 So. 2d 1353 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
    in denying the defendant's motion.