Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Kalathakis, 563 So. 2d 228.

39 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Deon Ray Bartie La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
    The Louisiana Supreme Court has held that, in a prosecution for felony-manslaughter, the prosecution is still required to prove that the “defendant’s conduct was a legal cause of the killing.” –33 (La.1990).
  • State Of Louisiana v. Patricia M. Currie La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
    14: 27( B)( 1); n. 1 La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Matthew L. Magrini La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
  • State Of Louisiana v. David Leger La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
  • State of Louisiana v. Chad M. Vidrine La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
    Generally, with respect to causation, (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. David Leger La. 2019
    “Causation is a question of fact which has to be considered in the light of the totality of the circumstances surrounding the ultimate harm and its relation to the actor’s conduct.” (La.
  • State v. Leonard 262 So. 3d 378 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
  • State v. Becnel 250 So. 3d 1207 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
    4/11/00), ; State v. Kalathakis , (La.
  • State v. Trung Le 243 So. 3d 637 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
  • State v. Leger 236 So. 3d 577 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
  • State v. Lutz 235 So. 3d 1114 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
    4/11/00), , 315-16; -33 (La.
  • State v. Louis-Juste 201 So. 3d 308 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
    State v. Dock, supra; State v. Beene, supra.
  • State v. Victor 195 So. 3d 128 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    State v. Myers, 99-1849 (La.4/11/00), ; State v. Garner, 238 La.
  • State of Louisiana Versus Errol Victor, Sr. La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2016
  • Steven Gillespie v. Calcasieu Parish School Board La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
    6/19/90), the supreme court explained causation and foreseeability impacting the determination of a co-perpetrator’s responsibility: A causal relation between the defendant's conduct and the harm for which the prosecutor seeks to impose criminal sanctions is an essential element of every crime.
  • State v. Brown 176 So. 3d 761 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    The Louisiana Supreme Court has held that, in a prosecution for felony-manslaughter, the prosecution is still required to prove that the “defendant’s condúct was a legal cause of the killing.” -33 (La.1990).
  • State v. Dock 167 So. 3d 1097 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
  • State v. Beene 164 So. 3d 299 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
  • State v. Smith 156 So. 3d 1227 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    Small , 11-2796, p. 12, 100 So.3d at 806 ; State v. Myers, 99-1849 (La.4/11/00), ; State v. Garner, 238 La.
  • State v. Watts 168 So. 3d 441 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
  • State v. Lewis 147 So. 3d 1251 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
  • State v. Duhe 130 So. 3d 880 La. 2013
    LEXIS 95034 85, at *5 (S.D.Iowa 2007) (noting the asso *887 ciation of paranoia with making and keeping methamphetamine and thus with guns); (addressing fatal consequences of a police raid on a methamphetamine lab | pleading to the death of the co-perpetrator after he engaged the officers in gun battle), Comeaux’s decision to handcuff defendant for the duration of the stop was justified for officer safety and did not convert the encounter from a
  • State v. Kenny 116 So. 3d 992 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
  • State v. Bellow 993 So. 2d 307 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
  • State v. Bowers 965 So. 2d 959 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
  • State v. Price 952 So. 2d 112 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
  • State v. Gourdine 946 So. 2d 277 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    the Supreme Court used the "substantial factor" standard and cited State v. Matthews, supra .
  • State v. Thomas 938 So. 2d 168 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    State v. Trahan, 93-1116, p. 11 (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Sherry S. Bailey La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
  • State v. Bailey 905 So. 2d 303 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
  • State v. Arnold 801 So. 2d 408 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    the court explained: A causal relation between the defendant's conduct and the harm for which the prosecutor seeks to impose criminal sanctions is an essential element of every crime.
  • State v. Myers 760 So. 2d 310 La. 2000
  • State v. Smith 748 So. 2d 1139 La. 1999
    (footnotes and citations omitted); see also 2 Wayne R. LaFave and Austin W. Scott, Jr., Substantive Criminal Law, § 7.5, pp. 211-12 (1986).
  • State v. Myers 735 So. 2d 935 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    the Louisiana Supreme Court reaffirmed its reasoning in Gamer.
  • State v. Richardson 729 So. 2d 114 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    : A causal relation between the defendant's conduct and the harm for which the prosecutor seeks to impose criminal sanctions is an essential element of every crime.
  • State v. Baker 720 So. 2d 767 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
  • State v. Trahan 637 So. 2d 694 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
  • State v. Archer 619 So. 2d 1071 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
  • State v. Vergo 594 So. 2d 1360 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
    the court reversed the defendant's conviction for manslaughter of her co-perpetrator who was fleeing the scene where he and the defendant were engaged in an attempt to manufacture methamphetamine.