Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Spellman, 562 So. 2d 455.

24 citing documents.

State Ex Rel. Darrell J. Robinson v. Darrel Vannoy, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, Angola, Louisiana La. 2024
[E]ven assuming the juror did see defendant in restraints, that brief incident does not appear to have so prejudiced defendant as to warrant relief on appeal.”); Cf., (La.
State of Louisiana v. Allen Joseph Morehead La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
Such an occurrence “infringes upon his presumption of innocence and denies the defendant due process of law.”
State v. Morehead 239 So. 3d 330 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Johnson 175 So. 3d 442 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
State v. Cleveland, 25,628 (La.App.2d Cir.01/19/94), ; State v. Licona, 13-543 (La.App.
State v. Licona 141 So. 3d 333 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
“Compelling a criminal defendant to stand trial in readily identifiable prison attire over his express objection infringes upon his presumption of innocence and denies the defendant due process of law.” citing Estelle v. Williams, 425 U.S. 501 , 96 S.Ct.
State ex rel. Lee. v. State 993 So. 2d 1209 La. 2008
State v. Adams 966 So. 2d 1247 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
1691 -93, 48 L.Ed.2d 126 (1976); (La.
State v. King 804 So. 2d 57 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
Const. Art. I, Section 16; citing Estelle v. Williams, 425 U.S. 501 , 96 S.Ct.
State v. Brown 793 So. 2d 422 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
the defendant was compelled to appear at trial in prison clothes over his express objection.
State v. Winding 787 So. 2d 385 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
1691 , 48 L.Ed.2d 126 (1976)
State v. Ricard 751 So. 2d 393 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
see also Estelle v. Williams, 425 U.S. 501 , 96 S.Ct.
State ex rel. Steele v. State 744 So. 2d 1273 La. 1999
Reasonable delay is appropriate to accommodate a defendant’s right to be tried in his own clothes and moreover, works no hardship on the state
State ex rel. Martin v. State 744 So. 2d 1273 La. 1999
State v. Ballay 727 So. 2d 1199 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. Egana 703 So. 2d 223 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
1691 , 48 L.Ed.2d 126 (1976); (on rehearing); State v. Tennant, 262 La.
State v. Johnson 693 So. 2d 233 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
see also Estelle v. Williams, 425 U.S. 501 , 96 S.Ct.
State v. Chambers 666 So. 2d 716 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
State v. Johnson 648 So. 2d 43 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
the defendant was compelled to attend trial in handcuffs and prison clothes.
State v. Hullaby 641 So. 2d 1094 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
Art. I, § 16; (emphasis added)
State v. Martin 624 So. 2d 448 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
1691 , 48 L.Ed.2d 126 (1976)
State v. Joseph 613 So. 2d 1131 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
In the primary case cited by Joseph, a reversal was in order because the defendant was forced to testify in prison attire.
State v. Anderson 603 So. 2d 776 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
1691 , 48 L.Ed.2d 126 (1976); (on rehearing); (La.
Spellman v. Desselles 596 So. 2d 843 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
The court, reversed the conviction on the grounds that Spellman was forced to stand trial in prison clothing, and remanded for a new trial.
State v. Dawson 490 So. 2d 560 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
State v. Talley, 446 * (La.App.