Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Davis, 556 So. 2d 53.

22 citing documents.

State v. Youngblood 274 So. 3d 716 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
App. 5th Cir. 1989), writs denied , (La.
State of Louisiana Versus Ron C. Youngblood La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
App. 5th Cir. 1989), writs denied, (La.
State v. Florant 119 So. 3d 635 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
5 Cir.1989), writ denied, and writ denied, this Court found a prospective juror’s wearing sunglasses in the courtroom, indicative of disrespect for the court, was a valid race-neutral explanation for striking that juror.
State v. Duplessy 853 So. 2d 77 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
5 Cir.1989), writ denied
State v. Anderson 786 So. 2d 917 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
5th Cir.1989), writ denied
State v. Johnson 783 So. 2d 520 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
5 Cir. 1989), writs denied
State v. Williams 735 So. 2d 62 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
5th Cir.1989), writ denied, State v. Sanders, 97-892 (La.App.
State v. London 720 So. 2d 1235 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
5th Cir.1989), writ denied
State v. Sanders 717 So. 2d 234 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
5 Cir.1989), writ denied, (La.
State v. Banks 694 So. 2d 401 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
5 Cir.1989), writs denied
State v. Sider 686 So. 2d 929 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
5 Cir.1989), writ denied
State v. Short 668 So. 2d 1240 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
5 Cir.1989), writ denied, this Court discussed Sokolow , stating as follows: A fair reading of the Sokolow opinion indicates that the specific and articulable facts to which a law enforcement officer must be able to point in justifying an investigatory stop are to be evaluated in light of all circumstances surrounding the particular
State v. Nieves 653 So. 2d 680 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
App. 5th Cir.1989), unit denied, this court held that perceived hostility, lack of interest and unresponsiveness are race-neutral reasons to exclude jurors.
State v. Green 634 So. 2d 503 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
5 Cir.1989), writs denied and (La.App.
State v. Spencer 631 So. 2d 1363 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
5 Cir.1989); writ denied, writ denied
State v. Jones 624 So. 2d 1249 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
writ denied, thoroughly discussed the law on airport detentions in light of the United States Supreme Court case discussed above.
State v. Porter 615 So. 2d 507 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
5th Cir.1989), writs denied
State v. Aubrey 609 So. 2d 1183 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
5th Cir. 1989), writs denied
State v. Barre 592 So. 2d 440 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
5th Cir.1989), writ denied, this Court discussed Sokolow , stating as follows: A fair reading of the Sokolow opinion indicates that the specific and articulable facts to which a law enforcement officer must be able to point in justifying an investigatory stop are to be evaluated in light of all circumstances surrounding the particular
State v. Garriga 592 So. 2d 453 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1991
App. 5 Cir.1989), writ denied, this Court thoroughly discussed the law on airport detentions in light of Sokolow .
State v. Tucker 591 So. 2d 1208 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
5th Cir.1989), writs denied, (La.
State v. Vanderlinder 575 So. 2d 521 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1991