Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. West, 568 So. 2d 1019.

41 citing documents.

State Of Louisiana v. BJ McElveen La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
State Of Louisiana v. Morris Joseph Hollins La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana v. Curtis White, Jr. A/K/A Curtis Ray White, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
3101, 92 L.Ed.2d 460 (1986); (following Rose).
State of Louisiana v. Kendarius Dewayne Sewell A/K/A Kendarius Sewell La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
3101, 92 L.Ed.2d 460 (1986); (following Rose).
State Of Louisiana v. David Leger La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
State of Louisiana v. Edwin Paul Frinks La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
3101, 92 L.Ed.2d 460 (1986); (following Rose ).
State v. Frinks 274 So. 3d 635 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
3101 , 92 L.Ed.2d 460 (1986) ; (following Rose ).
State v. Hartman 189 So. 3d 458 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Revish 185 So. 3d 8 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Wells 156 So. 3d 150 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Gatewood 103 So. 3d 627 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Seals 83 So. 3d 285 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Id., 04-924 at 9, 895 So.2d at 60
State v. Lay 986 So. 2d 255 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
State v. Anders 941 So. 2d 93 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Bunley , XXXX-XXXX, p. 14, 805 So.2d at 303
State of Louisiana v. Quantell Derell Anders La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Bunley, 2000-0405, p. 14, 805 So.2d at 303
State v. Scroggins 926 So. 2d 64 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
He stated he had gotten the instructions from a
State v. Martin 895 So. 2d 55 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
State v. Juarbe 824 So. 2d 1240 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
Bunley , XXXX-XXXX, p. 14, 805 So.2d at 303
State v. Bunley 805 So. 2d 292 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
State v. Thomas 750 So. 2d 1114 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Regardless, (cited by the defendant); this instruction requires the defendants to have specific intent to kill or cause great bodily harm.
State v. Battie 735 So. 2d 844 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
State v. Howard 751 So. 2d 783 La. 1999
1918 , 95 L.Ed.2d 439 (1987) (invalid instruction on the elements of an offense is harmless if the evidence is otherwise sufficient to support the jury's verdict and jury would have reached the same result if it had never heard the charge); (citing Pope ); cf. Sullivan v. Louisiana, 508 U.S. 275 , 113 S.Ct.
State v. Cedrington 725 So. 2d 565 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
the Louisiana Supreme Court set forth the standard for evaluating jury instructions: The test articulated is whether, taking the instruction as a whole, reasonable persons of ordinary intelligence would understand the charge.
State v. Robinson 713 So. 2d 828 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
State v. Hongo 706 So. 2d 419 La. 1997
3101 , 92 L.Ed.2d 460 (1986); (following Rose ).
State v. Ortiz 701 So. 2d 922 La. 1997
State v. Smith 687 So. 2d 529 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
the court outlined the standard for evaluating jury instructions, as follows: The test articulated is whether, taking the instruction as a whole, reasonable persons of ordinary intelligence would understand the charge.
State v. Phillips 670 So. 2d 588 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
824 , 17 L.Ed.2d 705 (1967)
State v. Laws 666 So. 2d 1118 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
State v. Duncan 648 So. 2d 1090 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
The trial judge charged the jury on alibi as follows: An alibi is evidence which seeks to prove that the defendant, at the time the crime is charged to have been committed, was at another place and therefore, could not have committed the crime.
State v. Gamble 631 So. 2d 586 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Cage v. Louisiana, supra
State v. Slan 624 So. 2d 451 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
State v. Bourque 622 So. 2d 198 La. 1993
State v. Riley 613 So. 2d 240 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
State v. Quatrevingt 617 So. 2d 484 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
824 , 17 L.Ed.2d 705 (1967)
State Ex Rel. White v. State 606 So. 2d 787 La. 1992
1283 , 18 L.Ed.2d 241 ; (1990).
State v. Watts 596 So. 2d 306 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
4th Cir.1989), writ granted, reversed, (La.
State v. Bairnsfather 591 So. 2d 686 La. 1991
824 , 17 L.Ed.2d 705 (1967)
State v. Velez 588 So. 2d 116 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
State v. Spotville 583 So. 2d 602 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
State v. Jenkins 573 So. 2d 1214 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
Often referred to as the "harmless error" rule, our Supreme Court, stated: "The well settled standard of harmless error, as set forth in Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18 [ 87 S.Ct.