Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Hallal, 557 So. 2d 1388.

80 citing documents.

State v. Scott 921 So. 2d 904 La. 2006
State v. Lindsey 928 So. 2d 541 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
This court reversed the trial court, -1390 (La.1990) (per curiam), wherein the court stated: [The prospective juror] never expressly stated that she could put aside her acquaintanceship with the police officers, and it was not reasonable for the trial court to accept assurances that she would judge the case impartially on the evidence at trial from
State v. Juniors 915 So. 2d 291 La. 2005
State v. Higgins 898 So. 2d 1219 La. 2005
Ball at p. 12 , 824 So.2d at 1102 (-90 (La.1990)).
State v. Bozeman 866 So. 2d 1029 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
a challenge for cause should be granted, even when a prospective juror declares his ability to remain impartial when the juror's response as a whole reveals facts from which biased, prejudice, or inability to render judgment according to the law may be reasonably implied.
State v. Kang 859 So. 2d 649 La. 2003
State v. Carmouche 872 So. 2d 1020 La. 2003
Ball at p. 7 , 824 So.2d at 1099 ; Robertson at p. 4 , 630 So.2d at 1281 ; -90 (La.1990) and cases cited therein.
State v. Price 842 So. 2d 491 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
Williams, supra, -90 (La.
State v. Williams 831 So. 2d 835 La. 2002
State v. Mitchell 818 So. 2d 807 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
[2] and the case was reversed and vacated, (La.
State v. Ball 824 So. 2d 1089 La. 2002
Scott v. American Tobacco Co. 795 So. 2d 1176 La. 2001
State v. Miller 776 So. 2d 396 La. 2000
State v. Paul 738 So. 2d 1128 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
State v. Johnson 706 So. 2d 468 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
Noting specifically that the State did not rehabilitate the jurors, this Court discussed two similar cases: held that a juror should have been dismissed for cause after she said she would assign greater credibility to the State because her husband worked for the Sheriff's Office and she knew the officers who would testify.
State v. Ledet 694 So. 2d 336 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
State v. Divers 681 So. 2d 320 La. 1996
State v. Mathis 675 So. 2d 1217 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
held that a juror should have been dismissed for cause after she said she would assign greater credibility to the State because her husband worked for the Sheriff's Office and she knew the officers who would testify.
State v. Tart 672 So. 2d 116 La. 1996
State v. Bolden 680 So. 2d 6 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Pressing his argument, -90 (La.
State v. Maxie 653 So. 2d 526 La. 1995
State v. Robertson 630 So. 2d 1278 La. 1994
State v. Jones 623 So. 2d 877 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
-1390 (La.1990), noted: While the trial judge is accorded broad discretion in ruling on challenges for cause, this Court has cautioned that "[a] challenge for cause should be granted, even when a prospective juror declares his ability to remain impartial, if the juror's responses as a whole reveal facts from whic
State v. Alexander 620 So. 2d 1166 La. 1993
State v. Bourque 622 So. 2d 198 La. 1993
State v. Hicks 607 So. 2d 937 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
1st Cir.1987), writ denied, reversed on other grounds
State v. Garris 603 So. 2d 277 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
3d Cir.1989), reversed on other grounds
State v. Ross 604 So. 2d 1036 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
the Louisiana Supreme Court found reversible error in the trial court's erroneous denial of a challenge for cause in a case in which the defense exhausted all of its peremptory challenges.
State v. Hallal 594 So. 2d 1071 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
State v. Isgitt 590 So. 2d 763 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991