DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Lee, 559 So. 2d 1310.

114 citing documents.

  • State v. Johnson 941 So. 2d 696 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
  • State v. Juniors 915 So. 2d 291 La. 2005
    Similarly, we held the fact that a prospective juror had previously retained the district attorney in an unrelated legal matter and might do so again in the future was insufficient to warrant a challenge for cause absent a further showing of bias.
  • State v. Manning 885 So. 2d 1044 La. 2004
    See e.g., Bourque, 622 So.2d at 229 (no abuse of discretion when trial court denied challenge for cause to juror previously charged with petty theft and who agreed that district attorney had done him a favor by allowing him to pay a fine rather than risk jail time); (fact that juror had previously hired district attorney on unrelated legal matter and stated that he might do so in the future insufficient basis to grant challenge for cause absent a showing that relationship with prosecutor would i
  • State v. Van Sales 867 So. 2d 849 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    1461 , 137 L.Ed.2d 564 (1997); cert.
  • State v. Bozeman 866 So. 2d 1029 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    State v. Cross, 93-1189 (La.6/30/95), 658 So.2d at 687; cited in State v. Turner, 96-845 (La.App.
  • State v. Matthews 859 So. 2d 863 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
    -1314 (La.1990), the Louisiana Supreme Court reviewed the jurisprudence of a claim of underepresentation of a minority in the jury venire as follows: A general jury venire "shall not be set aside for any reason unless fraud has been practiced, some great wrong committed that would work irreparable injury to the d
  • State v. Kang 859 So. 2d 649 La. 2003
  • State v. Carmouche 872 So. 2d 1020 La. 2003
    art. 905.2(A) regarding who may give victim impact testimony)
  • State v. Louviere 833 So. 2d 885 La. 2002
    [24] See, e.g., State v. Connolly, 96-1680 (La.7/1/97), ; State v. Comeaux, 93-2729 (La.7/1/97), ; State v. Martin, 93-0285 (La.10/17/94), ; cert.
  • State v. Loyd 810 So. 2d 1214 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    State v. Connolly, 96-1680 (La.07/01/97), ; State v. Butler, supra ; State v. Henderson, supra .
  • State v. Brooks 807 So. 2d 1090 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    [7] See also State v. Wessinger, 98-1234 (La.5/28/99), , 170-172, -1315 (La.
  • State v. Royal 807 So. 2d 962 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
  • State v. Duncan 802 So. 2d 533 La. 2001
    [30] See, e.g., State v. Connolly, 96-1680 (La.7/1/97), ; State v. Comeaux, 93-2729 (La.7/1/97), ; State v. Martin, 93-0285 (La.10/17/94), ; cert.
  • State v. Jacobs 789 So. 2d 1280 La. 2001
  • State v. Edwards 790 So. 2d 109 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
  • State v. Taylor 781 So. 2d 1205 La. 2001
    Robertson , 92-2660, p. 3 (La.1/14/94), 630 So.2d at 1280-1281 , (La.
  • State v. Cosey 779 So. 2d 675 La. 2000
    2252 , 132 L.Ed.2d 260 (1995); State v. Wille, supra ; cert.
  • State v. Richardson 779 So. 2d 771 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    1461 , 137 L.Ed.2d 564 (1997); cert.
  • State v. Miller 776 So. 2d 396 La. 2000
  • State v. Harris 765 So. 2d 1230 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
  • State v. Johnson 759 So. 2d 1052 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
  • State v. Coleman 756 So. 2d 1218 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    State v. Connolly, 96-1680 (La.7/1/97), ; State v. Butler, supra ; State v. Henderson, supra .
  • State v. Thibodeaux 750 So. 2d 916 La. 1999
    art. 786; State v. Maxie, 93-2158 (La.4/10/95); -35 ; -69 (La.1993); (La.
  • State v. Wessinger 736 So. 2d 162 La. 1999
  • State v. Jordan 728 So. 2d 954 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
  • State v. Flanagan 724 So. 2d 817 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
    the court found the fact that a prospective juror had previously hired the district attorney for some unrelated legal business and that he might do so in the future was not a sufficient reason to grant a challenge for cause.
  • State v. Guillory 715 So. 2d 400 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
  • State v. Ashworth 704 So. 2d 228 La. 1997
  • State v. Brown 702 So. 2d 744 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
  • State v. Connolly 700 So. 2d 810 La. 1997
  • State v. Pooler 696 So. 2d 22 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
  • State v. Hart 691 So. 2d 651 La. 1997
  • State v. Turner 692 So. 2d 612 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
    Cross, 658 So.2d at 687 ; (La.
  • State v. Smith 687 So. 2d 529 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
  • State v. Thomas 683 So. 2d 1272 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
  • State v. Walker 681 So. 2d 1023 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
  • State v. Allen 682 So. 2d 713 La. 1996
    [11] In one case, the death sentence was vacated on rehearing and a new sentencing hearing was ordered; however, the death penalty was reinstated at the second sentencing hearing.
  • State v. Divers 681 So. 2d 320 La. 1996
    -81 (La.1994); State v. Ross, *324 -64 (La.1986).
  • State v. Thomas 680 So. 2d 37 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
  • State v. Bolden 680 So. 2d 6 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
  • State v. Perrilloux 669 So. 2d 7 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
  • State v. Cross 658 So. 2d 683 La. 1995
  • State v. Maxie 653 So. 2d 526 La. 1995
    1/14/94); 630 So.2d at 1280-1281 , -264 (La.1986).
  • State v. Fleeks 651 So. 2d 370 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
  • State v. Robertson 630 So. 2d 1278 La. 1994
    *1281 93 (La.1987); -66 (La.1986).
  • State v. Outley 629 So. 2d 1243 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
  • State v. Davis 626 So. 2d 800 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
  • State v. Watkins 625 So. 2d 507 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
  • State v. Ross 623 So. 2d 643 La. 1993
  • State v. Alexander 620 So. 2d 1166 La. 1993