DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Richardson, 575 So. 2d 421.

54 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Troy Collins La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2019
  • State v. Williams 225 So. 3d 1124 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
    App. 4 Cir. 1/10/07), ; (La.
  • State v. Mahogany 191 So. 3d 615 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    4 Cir. 1/10/07), ; (La.App.
  • State v. Gibson 186 So. 3d 772 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    App. 4 Cir. 1/10/07), ; (La.App.
  • State v. Greenberry 164 So. 3d 824 La. 2015
  • State v. Whitley 156 So. 3d 800 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    State v. Pierre, 2002-2665, p. 1 (La.3/28/03), ; (La.App.
  • State v. Edwards 133 So. 3d 132 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    4 Cir. 1/10/07), ; (La.App.
  • State v. Biddy 129 So. 3d 768 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    State v. Pierre, 02-2665, p. 1 (La.3/28/03), ; (La.App.
  • State v. Denson 83 So. 3d 1183 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    trial by jury in several cases and has made it clear that the preferred practice for obtaining a valid waiver of a defendant’s right to trial by jury is “for the trial judge to advise the defendant personally on the record of his right to trial by jury and require the defendant to waive the right personally either in writing or by oral statement in open court on the record.” (La.App.
  • State v. Martin 72 So. 3d 928 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    It is clear that the preferred practice for obtaining a valid waiver of the right to trial by jury is “for the trial judge to advise the defendant personally on the record of his right to trial by jury and require the defendant to waive the right personally either in writing or by oral statement in open court on the record.” (La.App.
  • State v. Peters 60 So. 3d 672 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    rial by jury in several cases and has made it clear that the preferred practice for obtaining a valid waiver of a defendant’s right to trial by jury is “for the trial judge to advise the defendant personally on the record of his right to trial |9by jury and require the defendant to waive the right personally either in writing or by oral statement in open court on the record.” (La.App.
  • State v. Watson 993 So. 2d 779 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
  • State v. Jones 846 So. 2d 908 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    This Court has made it clear that the preferred practice for obtaining a valid waiver of a defendant’s right to trial by jury is “for the trial judge to advise the defendant personally on the record of his right to trial by jury and require the defendant to waive the right personally either in writing or by oral statement in open court on the record.” (La.App.
  • State v. Cooper 830 So. 2d 440 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
  • State v. Vingle 802 So. 2d 887 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
  • State v. Sylvester 781 So. 2d 616 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
  • State v. Boson 778 So. 2d 687 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
  • State v. Francois 778 So. 2d 673 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
  • State v. Devore 776 So. 2d 597 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Lewis 772 So. 2d 231 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Phillips 774 So. 2d 989 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
  • State v. Brown 773 So. 2d 742 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
  • State v. Bazile 757 So. 2d 851 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Scott 754 So. 2d 1108 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Harris 744 So. 2d 160 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
  • State v. Hill 743 So. 2d 773 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
  • State v. Creecy 742 So. 2d 615 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
  • State v. Ratliff 737 So. 2d 252 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
  • State v. Cook 733 So. 2d 1227 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
  • State v. Poche 733 So. 2d 730 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
  • State v. Dappemont 734 So. 2d 736 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
  • State v. Willis 728 So. 2d 493 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
  • State v. Sheehan 740 So. 2d 127 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
  • State v. Jones 720 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
  • State v. Dillon 719 So. 2d 1064 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
  • State v. Smith 715 So. 2d 547 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
  • State v. Mandigo 702 So. 2d 351 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
    5th Cir. 12/14/94), ; (La.App.
  • State v. Taylor 701 So. 2d 766 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
  • State v. Basile 700 So. 2d 1062 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
  • State v. Clausen 697 So. 2d 1066 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
  • State v. Short 694 So. 2d 549 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
  • State v. Smith 694 So. 2d 509 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
  • State v. Curtis 681 So. 2d 1287 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
  • State v. Sneed 680 So. 2d 1237 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
  • State v. Ellington 680 So. 2d 174 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
  • State v. Hebert 669 So. 2d 499 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
  • State v. Houston 648 So. 2d 948 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
    State v. *950 Richardson, (La.App.
  • State v. Martin 643 So. 2d 830 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
  • State v. Finne 632 So. 2d 819 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
  • State v. Thornton 621 So. 2d 173 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993