Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Lyons, 597 So. 2d 593.
-
State v. Alridge
249 So. 3d 260
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
1979) (declining to reverse when record did not include voir dire examination transcript and the court reporter's affidavit indicated that no objections were made by the attorneys during voir dire); See also State v. Lyons , (La.
-
State v. Handy
226 So. 3d 1182
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
1979) (declining to reverse when record did not include voir dire examination transcript and the court reporter’s affidavit indicated that nonobjections were made by the attorneys, during voir dire); (La.
-
State v. Jones
220 So. 3d 128
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
1979) (declining to reverse when record did not include voir dire examination transcript and the court reporter’s affidavit indicated that no objections were made by the attorneys during voir dire); (La.
- State v. Norah 131 So. 3d 172 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
-
State v. Massey
51 So. 3d 808
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Second, “inconsequential omissions or slight inaccuracies do not require reversal.” Frank, supra, (declining to reverse when record did not include transcript of voir dire examination and the court reporter’s affidavit indicated that no objections were made by the attorneys during voir dire); (La.App.
-
State v. Stukes
19 So. 3d 1233
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Second, “inconsequential omissions or slight inaccuracies do not require reversal.” Frank, supra, (declining to reverse when ^record did not include transcript of voir dire examination and the court reporter’s affidavit indicated that no objections were made by the attorneys during voir dire); (La.App.
-
State v. Scott
913 So. 2d 843
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
Frank, supra, (declining to reverse when record did not include transcript of voir dire examination and the court reporter's affidavit indicated that no objections were made by the attorneys during voir dire); (La.App.
-
State v. Young
839 So. 2d 186
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
[5] (declining to reverse when record did not include transcript of voir dire examination and court reporter's affidavit indicated that no objections were made by the attorneys during voir dire); (La.App.
- State v. Simpson 829 So. 2d 650 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
-
State v. Harry
823 So. 2d 987
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
Frank, supra ((declining to reverse when record did not include transcript of voir dire examination and court reporter's affidavit indicated that no objections were made by the attorneys during voir dire)); (La.App.
- State v. Bright 809 So. 2d 1112 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
- State v. Winding 787 So. 2d 385 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
- State v. Brauner 782 So. 2d 52 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
-
State v. Hawkins
667 So. 2d 1070
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
*1087 Also, -99 (La.App.
-
State v. Wise
644 So. 2d 230
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
in which this Court held that it was not error to refuse to order production of the transcript of jury charges because the minute entry of trial did not reflect an objection during that portion of the trial and appellate counsel was precluded from raising that claim; in which this Court affirmed a conviction although the record did not contain a transcript of voir dire, impaneling of the jury or opening statements, because the defendant did not urge an error in those portions of the trial and fa
- State v. Murphy 613 So. 2d 778 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993