Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Brown, 585 So. 2d 1211.

15 citing documents.

State v. Licona 141 So. 3d 333 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
citing Estelle v. Williams, supra.
State v. King 804 So. 2d 57 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
quoting Estelle, 425 U.S. at 513 , 96 S.Ct.
State v. Winding 787 So. 2d 385 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
quoting Estelle, 425 U.S. at 513 , 96 S.Ct.
State v. Ricard 751 So. 2d 393 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
(quoting Estelle, supra at 513 , 96 S.Ct.
State v. Ballay 727 So. 2d 1199 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. Egana 703 So. 2d 223 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
-1213 (La.1991), the Louisiana Supreme Court reviewed the law on point: Compelling a criminal defendant to stand trial in readily identifiable prison attire over his express objection infringes upon his presumption of innocence and denies the defendant due process of law.
State v. Johnson 693 So. 2d 233 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
(quoting Estelle, supra at 513 , 96 S.Ct.
State v. Brown 677 So. 2d 1057 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
State v. Wise 644 So. 2d 230 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
1691 , 48 L.Ed.2d 126 (1976); (La.
State v. Hullaby 641 So. 2d 1094 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
Art. I, § 16; (emphasis added)
State v. Bradham 638 So. 2d 428 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
1974, Art. I, Section 16
State v. Brabham 638 So. 2d 428 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
1974, Art. I, Section 16
State v. Cleveland 630 So. 2d 1365 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
State v. Martin 624 So. 2d 448 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
State v. Anderson 603 So. 2d 776 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
-1213 (La.1991), a per curiam opinion, the Court rejected the Fourth's Circuit's harmless error analysis as follows: Compelling a criminal defendant to stand trial in readily identifiable prison attire over his express objection infringes upon his presumption of innocence and denies the defendant due process of l