DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite In Re Chaisson, 549 So. 2d 259.

67 citing documents.

  • In Re King 857 So. 2d 432 La. 2003
    In recommending discipline, the Commission looked to the factors set forth by this court in In re: Chaisson, [11] and concluded as follows: (A) and (B) Judge King acted impermissibly in his handling of Ms. Wallace's refusal to participate in his political fund raising.
  • In Re Parro 847 So. 2d 1178 La. 2003
    In re: Best, 98-0122 (La.10/20/98), ; In re: Chaisson
  • In Re Fuselier 837 So. 2d 1257 La. 2003
  • In Re Hunter 823 So. 2d 325 La. 2002
    In re Jefferson, 99-1313, p. 3 (La.1/19/00), -85 ; In re Bowers, 98-1735, p. 7 (La.12/1/98), ; In re Quirk, 97-1143, p. 4 (La.12/12/97), ; In re Marullo, 96-2222, p. 3 (La.4/8/97), ; In re Decuir, 95-0056, p. 7 (La.5/22/95)
  • In Re Shea 815 So. 2d 813 La. 2002
    In re: Best, 98-0122 (La.10/20/98), ; In re: Chaisson
  • In Re Justice of Peace Landry 789 So. 2d 1271 La. 2001
    In recommending discipline, the Commission looked to the list of factors set forth by this Court in
  • In Re McInnis 769 So. 2d 1186 La. 2000
    The Commission, after reviewing the factors set forth in recommended that respondent be censured and ordered to reimburse the Commission for costs.
  • In Re Emanuel 755 So. 2d 862 La. 1999
    RECOMMENDATION FOR DISCIPLINE After considering the factors listed in [5] *869 the Commission recommended that Judge Emanuel be censured for his conduct and that he reimburse and pay the Commission the costs incurred in the amount of $4,582.99, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XXIII, Section 22.
  • In re Emanuel 731 So. 2d 229 La. 1999
    RECOMMENDATION FOR DISCIPLINE After considering the factors listed in 5 *236 the Commission recommended that Judge Emanuel be censured for his conduct and that he reimburse and pay the Commission the costs incurred in the amount of $4,582.99, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XXIII, Section 22.
  • In Re Bowers 721 So. 2d 875 La. 1998
  • In Re Best 719 So. 2d 432 La. 1998
  • In Re Harris 713 So. 2d 1138 La. 1998
    DISCIPLINE In citing In Matter of Deming, 108 Wash.2d 82 , 736 P.2d 639, 659 (1987), we adopted the following non-exclusive list of factors to consider in imposing discipline on a judge: (a) whether the misconduct is an isolated instance or evidenced a pattern of conduct; (b) the nature, extent and frequency of occu
  • In Re Cooks 694 So. 2d 892 La. 1997
    [15] We have previously used an objective standard to determine whether a judge's actions gave the appearance of impropriety in (La.
  • In Re Marullo 692 So. 2d 1019 La. 1997
  • In Re Lemoine 686 So. 2d 837 La. 1997
  • In Re Johnson 683 So. 2d 1196 La. 1996
    Huckaby, 95-0041 at p. 6, 656 So.2d at 296 ; , 263 n. 4 (La.
  • In Re Huckaby 656 So. 2d 292 La. 1995