Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Gilboy v. American Tobacco Co., 582 So. 2d 1263.

39 citing documents.

Earnest Williams (D) v. United Medical Healthcare Inc La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2025
Code] art. 2323 requires the trier of fact to make a determination as to the fault of all parties.”); (La.
ADELMANN-CHESTER v. Kent 33 So. 3d 187 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
10 Therefore, in light of Gilboy , the LPLA has prospective effect only because it overruled Halphen.
Benard v. EAGLE, INC. 1 So. 3d 588 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
Scott v. American Tobacco 830 So. 2d 294 La. 2002
the court of appeal concluded that comparative fault of all the parties, including plaintiffs, should be considered, even if the only theories asserted in Phase I of the trial involve issues of intentional conduct by defendants.
Warren v. Sabine Towing and Transp. Co. 831 So. 2d 517 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
a case in which the exposure occurred and suit was filed prior to the enactment of the LPLA, the supreme court held that the LPLA alters substantive rights and is not retroactive.
Asbestos v. Bordelon, Inc. 726 So. 2d 926 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
Therefore, in light of Gilboy , the LPLA has prospective effect only because it overruled Halphen .
Pitre v. GAF Corp. 705 So. 2d 1149 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
[6] a case involving a claim for damages by a smoker against cigarette manufacturers and a vendor, the Supreme Court held the LPLA altered substantive rights and is not retroactive.
Nichols v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 698 So. 2d 53 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
and Hataway v. Jeep Corp., 96-166 (La.App.
Maher v. Costa Lines Cargo Services, Inc. 691 So. 2d 1303 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Thomas v. Medical Center of Southwest Louisiana 685 So. 2d 706 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Clark v. JESUIT HIGH SCH. OF NEW ORLEANS 686 So. 2d 998 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
Hickman v. Exide, Inc. 679 So. 2d 527 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
Hataway v. Jeep Corp. 679 So. 2d 913 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Mistich v. Volkswagen of Germany, Inc. 666 So. 2d 1073 La. 1996
Taylor v. American Laundry MacHinery, Inc. 658 So. 2d 288 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
Young v. Logue 660 So. 2d 32 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
the supreme court opined that Halphen `s theories of recovery are substantive rights that cannot be retroactively revoked by the Act.
Drury v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc. 659 So. 2d 738 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Hines v. Remington Arms Co., Inc. 648 So. 2d 331 La. 1994
Randolph v. General Motors Corp. 646 So. 2d 1019 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Hopper v. Crown 646 So. 2d 933 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Delery v. Prudential Ins. Co. of America 643 So. 2d 807 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
Quick v. Murphy Oil Co. 643 So. 2d 1291 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
Longo v. EI DuPont De Nemours & Co. 632 So. 2d 1193 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
Segura v. Frank 630 So. 2d 714 La. 1994
( (emphasis supplied by quoting court)).
Mathieu v. Imperial Toy Corp. 632 So. 2d 375 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
Futrell v. Scott Truck and Tractor Co. 629 So. 2d 449 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Being substantive in nature, see, we find that the trial court properly excluded the charge since the Louisiana Products Liability Act can have only prospective application.
Laing v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc. 628 So. 2d 196 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
Guidroz v. Lewis 626 So. 2d 736 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
Simeon v. Doe 618 So. 2d 848 La. 1993
Boh Bros. Const. Co., Inc. v. Luber-Finer, Inc. 612 So. 2d 270 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. Smith 609 So. 2d 809 La. 1992
-26 (La.1985); Ardoin v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co., Commercial Credit Claims Services, (La.App.
Duncan ex rel. Hahn v. South Central Bell Telephone Co. 608 So. 2d 649 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
Spott v. Otis Elevator Co. 601 So. 2d 1355 La. 1992
held the Louisiana Products Liability Act, La.R.S.
Cole v. Celotex Corp. 599 So. 2d 1058 La. 1992
( reh'g denied ) (finding Act alters substantive rights and is not retroactive); See also Walker v. Babcock Industries, Inc., (La.App.
Cosse v. Allen-Bradley Co. 601 So. 2d 1349 La. 1992
Sharkey v. Sterling Drug, Inc. 600 So. 2d 701 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Page v. Gilbert 598 So. 2d 1110 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
However, held, in a recent decision, that the Louisiana Products Liability Act, LSA-R.S.
Moore v. Chrysler Corp. 596 So. 2d 225 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
Cole v. Celotex Corp. 588 So. 2d 376 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
3 Cir.1991), filed a holds that comparative fault principles should apply retroactively.