Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Stockwell v. Great Atlantic & Pacific, 583 So. 2d 1186.
-
Thompson v. Winn-Dixie Montgomery, Inc.
158 So. 3d 41
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
As noted by the court in Stockwell v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., (La.App.
-
Schroeder v. Walgreens Family of Companies
150 So. 3d 926
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
1 Cir. 3/28/07) , , unit denied, 2007-0875 (La.6/22/07), (citing Stockwell v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, (La.App.
-
Madeline Guillory v. Boyd Louisiana Racing Inc.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
“In the context of slip and fall cases, a hazard is shown to exist when the fall results from a foreign substance on the floor or from an otherwise unreasonably slippery condition.” Stockwell v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., (La.App.
-
Pena v. Delchamps, Inc.
960 So. 2d 988
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
Stockwell v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, (La.App.
-
Tracie Bernard v. Family Dollar Stores of Louisiana, Inc.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
As noted by the court in Stockwell v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., (La.App.
-
Nelson v. Southeast Food, Inc.
892 So. 2d 790
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
As noted by the court in Stockwell v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., (La.App.
-
Bridget J. Dotson v. Brookshire Grocery Company
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
As noted by the court in Stockwell v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., (La.App.
-
Dotson v. Brookshire Grocery Co.
872 So. 2d 1283
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
As noted by the court in Stockwell v. Great Atlantic & Pacific *1286 Tea Co., (La.App.
-
Jones v. Brookshire Grocery Co.
847 So. 2d 43
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
As noted by the court in Stockwell v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., (La.App.
-
Harrison v. Horseshoe Entertainment
823 So. 2d 1124
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
Ward v. ITT Specialty Risk Services, Inc., supra ; Stockwell v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, (La.App.
-
Turner v. Brookshire Grocery Co.
785 So. 2d 161
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
2d Cir.1981); Stockwell v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., (La.App.
-
Hardman v. Kroger Co.
775 So. 2d 1093
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
As noted by the court in Stockwell v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., (La.App.
-
Ward v. ITT Specialty Risk Services, Inc.
739 So. 2d 251
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
Stockwell v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, (La.App.
- Kennedy v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 715 So. 2d 593 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
- Kumpe v. State 701 So. 2d 498 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
-
Jackson v. Delchamps, Inc.
691 So. 2d 332
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
1 Cir. 11/9/95) , ; Stockwell v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, (La.App.
-
Stevens v. Winn-Dixie of Louisiana
664 So. 2d 1207
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Stockwell v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, (La.App.
-
Choyce v. SISTERS
642 So. 2d 287
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
2d Cir.1992), writ denied, Stockwell v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, (La.App.
-
Explained
Sims v. Winn Dixie Louisiana, Inc.
638 So. 2d 716
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
As explained in Stockwell v. Great Atlantic & Pacific, (La.App.
- Breaux v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 635 So. 2d 667 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
-
Inzerella v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
640 So. 2d 329
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Castille, supra; see, Stock-well v. Great Atlantic & Pacific, (La.App.
-
Saucier v. Kugler, Inc.
628 So. 2d 1309
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Stockwell v. The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., (La.App.
-
Braud v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., Inc.
618 So. 2d 1069
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Stockwell v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, (La.App.
-
Richard v. Dollar General Store
606 So. 2d 831
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
Stockwell v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, (La.App.
-
Castille v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea
591 So. 2d 1299
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
Stockwell v. Great Atlantic & Pacific, (La.App.
-
Tannehill v. Brookshire Grocery Co.
588 So. 2d 1282
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
In Stockwell v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, (La.App.