Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Carter v. BRMAP, 591 So. 2d 1184.

48 citing documents.

SRG Baton Rouge II, L.L.C v. Patten/Jenkins BR Popeye's, L.L.C. La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
Wilvan M. Miller, Et Ux v. Morrison Environmental Services, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
Cypress Heights Academy, Inc. v. CHA Investors, LLC La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2022
The Country Club of Louisiana Property Owners Association, Inc. v. The Baton Rouge Water Works Company La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
Dinah Fontanille v. Stephanie Reynolds Robertson, wife of and Byron Todd Robertson La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
Gilbert v. Andry, IV and Gibby Andry, the Andry Law Firm, LLC v. Omega Hospital, L.L.C. La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2019
Georgia-Pacific Consumer Operations, LLC v. City of Baton Rouge 255 So. 3d 16 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Specialty Retailers, Inc. v. Rb River IV, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
3 Cir. 8/17/16), ( (La.App.
Specialty Retailers, Inc. v. RB River IV LLC 237 So. 3d 63 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
3 Cir. 8/17/16), , 946 ( , 1188 (La.App.
Succession of Dinesh Shaw, M.d v. Alexandria Investment Group, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
Shaw v. Alexandria Inv. Grp., LLC 248 So. 3d 332 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
See Carter v. BRMAP , (La.App.
Lfi Fort Pierce, Inc. v. Acme Steel Buildings, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
LFI Fort Pierce, Inc. v. Acme Steel Buildings, Inc. 200 So. 3d 939 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Keystone Energy Company, LLC v. Denbury Onshore, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
Keystone Energy Co. v. Denbury Onshore, LLC 188 So. 3d 458 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
J.D. Fields & Co. v. Nottingham Construction Co. 184 So. 3d 713 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
1st Cir.6/21/02), 66 (contract providing that contractor “assumes the entire responsibility and liability” for losses and injuries was not sufficiently clear to establish stipulation pour autrui, and plaintiff produced no evidence showing that third party’s relationship with parties to contract formed a part of the consideration for contract); 1192 (La.App.
First Bank & Trust v. Redman Gaming of Louisiana, Inc. 131 So. 3d 224 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Hoffman v. Travelers Indemnity Co. of America 121 So. 3d 106 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
v. Lafayette Parish School Bd., 2006-2862 (La.6/29/07), ; (La.App.
John Paul Sapir, LLC v. Yum! Brands, Inc. 106 So. 3d 646 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
The Appellant, in support of its argument, cites Carter v. BRMAP, wherein the First Circuit opined that “[a]s a general rule, a motion for summary judgment ‘[i]s rarely appropriate for a determination based on subjective facts such as intent, motive, malice, knowledge or good faith.’ ” (La.App.
Smith v. Casino New Orleans Casino 101 So. 3d 507 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
4 Cir. 3/6/02), ( (La.App.
Wooley v. LUCKSINGER 7 So. 3d 660 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Davis v. Picard 986 So. 2d 256 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Louisiana Pigment Company, Lp v. Scott Construction Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
“However, even though granting a summary judgment based on an intent issue may be rare, it can be done when there is no issue of material fact concerning the pertinent intent.” (La.App.
Louisiana Pigment Co. v. Scott Const. Co. 945 So. 2d 980 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Thomas v. North 40 Land Development, Inc. 894 So. 2d 1160 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
However, the general rule that summary judgment is inappropriate in cases involving state of mind issues is only applicable "`where solid circumstantial evidence exists to prove plaintiff's case.'" (La.App.
Motorola, Inc. v. Associated Indem. Corp. 867 So. 2d 723 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
District No. 1, (La.App.
King v. Phelps Dunbar, LLP 844 So. 2d 1012 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
App. 4 Cir. 3/6/02), , writ denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.9/13/02), , (La.App.
Wood v. Becnel 840 So. 2d 1225 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Fourroux v. Orleans Levee Dist. 837 So. 2d 698 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
Vanderbrook v. Coachmen Industries, Inc. 818 So. 2d 906 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Haney v. Delta Petroleum Co., Inc. 811 So. 2d 1200 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
Kelly v. West Cash & Carry Bldg. Materials 745 So. 2d 743 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
duPont de Nemours and Co., Inc., (La.App.
Sanders v. Ashland Oil, Inc. 696 So. 2d 1031 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Osborne v. Ladner 691 So. 2d 1245 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
art.2048; McCrory v. Terminix Service Co., Inc., 609 So.2d at 885 ; (La.
Credeur v. McCullough 685 So. 2d 300 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
du Pont de Nemours and Co., (holding that “[sjummary judgment is an appropriate method for disposing of a ease wherein intent is a critical question”); (La.App.
Losavio v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co. 675 So. 2d 821 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
SEC. CENTER PROT. SERV. v. Lafayette SEC. & Electronic Systems, Inc. 668 So. 2d 1156 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
Slocum-Stevens Ins. Agency, Inc. v. International Risk Consultants, Inc. 666 So. 2d 352 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
See, for example, Smith, supra, (La.App.
Lybrand v. Newman 663 So. 2d 850 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
Commercial Life Ins. Co. v. Robinson 662 So. 2d 486 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
Smith v. OUR LADY OF LAKE HOSP. 639 So. 2d 730 La. 1994
du Pont de Nemours and Co., (holding that "[s]ummary judgment is an appropriate method for disposing of a case wherein intent is a critical question"); (La.
Smith v. Our Lady of the Lake Hospital, Inc. 639 So. 2d 730 La. 1994
du Pont de Nemours and Co., (holding that “[s]ummary judgment is an appropriate method for disposing of a case wherein intent is a critical question”); (La.App.
Barker v. Whittington 628 So. 2d 237 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Smith v. Our Lady of the Lake Hosp., Inc. 624 So. 2d 1239 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
App. 1st Cir.1992); (La.App.
Phoenix Assur. Co. of NY v. Shell Oil Co. 611 So. 2d 709 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
McCrory v. Terminix Service Co., Inc. 609 So. 2d 883 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
art. 2045, et seq.; Dixie Campers, *886 (La.1981); (La.App.
Hawthorn, Waymouth & Carroll v. Johnson 611 So. 2d 645 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Neuberger, Coerver & Goins v. Times Picayune Pub. 597 So. 2d 1179 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Du Pont De Nemours and Company, Inc., (La.App.