Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Mayerhofer v. Three R's Inc., 597 So. 2d 151.

20 citing documents.

Sherri Transier v. Barnes Building, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
“Absent an abuse of discretion, an appellate court will not disturb a trial court’s assessment of damages.” Mayerhofer v. Three R’s Inc., (La.App.
Transier v. Barnes Building, LLC 166 So. 3d 1249 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
“Absent an abuse of discretion, an appellate court will not disturb a trial court’s assessment of damages.” Mayerhofer v. Three R’s Inc., (La.App.
Bayou Rapides Corp. v. Michael Dole, Et Ux. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
They rely on our decision in Mayerhofer v. Three R’s Inc., (La.
Bayou Rapides Corp. v. Dole 165 So. 3d 373 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
They rely on our decision in Mayerhofer v. Three R’s Inc., (La.App.
Ledbetter v. Homes by Paige, L.L.C. 110 So. 3d 141 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
4 Cir. 7/19/00) , (non-pecuniary damages awarded for breach of contract to build home that was culmination of a lifelong dream of rising from the housing projects to homeownership) and Mayerhofer v. Three R’s Inc., (La.App.
Bowser v. PREMIER AUTOMOTIVE GROUP 971 So. 2d 426 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
[2] Mayerhofer v. Three R's, Inc., (La.App.
Aucoin v. Southern Quality Homes, LLC 953 So. 2d 856 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
App. 3 Cir. 3/6/98), , and Mayerhofer v. Three R's, Inc., (La.App.
Kelly G. Aucoin v. Southern Quality Homes, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
3 Cir. 3/6/98), and Mayerhofer v. Three R’s, Inc., (La.App.
Corbello v. Iowa Production 850 So. 2d 686 La. 2003
1 Cir.1970) (holding that non-pecuniary damages were due from a seller of a house who, before delivery, purposely destroys the home's interior); (La.App.
Austin Homes, Inc. v. Thibodeaux 821 So. 2d 10 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
3 Cir. 3/6/98) , ; (La.App.
Beasley v. Ed's Mobile Homes, Inc. 824 So. 2d 383 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
Similarly, in Mayerhofer v. Three R's, Inc., (La.App.
Hernandez v. Martinez 781 So. 2d 815 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Mayerhofer v. Three R’s Inc., (La.App.
McGough v. Oakwood Mobile Homes, Inc. 779 So. 2d 793 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
Also compare Mayerhofer v. Three R's, Inc., (La.App.
Thomas v. Desire Community Housing Corp. 773 So. 2d 755 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
Against this backdrop the Third Circuit decided Mayerhofer v. Three R's, Inc., (La.App.
L & a CONTRACTING v. Ram Indus. Coatings, Inc. 762 So. 2d 1223 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Martinez v. Reno 742 So. 2d 1014 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
3rd Cir. 3/6/98), ; , (La.App.
Sanders v. Zeagler 670 So. 2d 748 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Ganheart v. Executive House Apartments 671 So. 2d 525 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
5th Cir. 2/9/94), , and for the breach of a contract to build a new home, (La.App.
Broom v. LEEBRON & ROBINSON RENT a CAR 626 So. 2d 1212 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
See generally, Young v. Ford Motor Company, Inc., (La.App.
Mayerhofer v. Three R's Inc. 600 So. 2d 680 La. 1992
*681 Prior report: La.App., .

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by