Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Corbello v. Southern Pacific Transp. Co., 586 So. 2d 1383.
-
Christopher Handy, Etc. v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
1 Cir.), writ denied, “The question of whether the train sounded its horn for the required distance or whether [the plaintiff] should have been able to plainly view the train under the prevailing conditions at this railroad crossing are questions of fact to be determined by the jury.” Further, (La.App.
-
Handy ex rel. Handy v. Union Pacific Railroad
896 So. 2d 316
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
1988), “The question of whether the train sounded its horn for the required distance or whether [the plaintiff] should have been able to plainly view the train under the prevailing conditions at this railroad crossing are questions of fact to be determined by the jury.” Further, (La.App.
- HANDY EX REL. HANDY v. Union Pacific R. Co. 896 So. 2d 316 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
- Brown v. Permanent General Insurance Co. 783 So. 2d 467 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
- Kendrick v. Louisiana and North West R. Co. 766 So. 2d 705 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
- Whitehead v. Kansas City Southern Ry. Co. 758 So. 2d 211 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
- Pinsonneault v. Merchants & Farmers Bank 738 So. 2d 172 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
- Turner v. Parish of Jefferson Through Dept. of Recreation 721 So. 2d 64 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
- Gilbert v. Laborde 632 So. 2d 1162 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
- Spurrell v. Ivey 630 So. 2d 1378 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
- Antee v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co. 627 So. 2d 798 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
- Bordelon v. SOUTH CENT. BELL TELEPHONE CO. 617 So. 2d 1337 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
- Givens v. Cracco 607 So. 2d 727 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
-
Corbello v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.
589 So. 2d 1052
La. 1991
Prior report: La.App., .
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co. 586 So. 2d 1390 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991