Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Lirette v. State Farm Ins. Co., 563 So. 2d 850.

225 citing documents.

Mathis v. City of DeRidder 599 So. 2d 378 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
Co., we find no manifest error in the trial judge's findings of fact or in his evaluations and reconciliations of the expert testimony.
Westridge v. Poydras Properties 598 So. 2d 586 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
Finley v. State Farm Ins. Co. 598 So. 2d 537 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Miley v. La. Farm Bureau Cas. Ins. Co. 599 So. 2d 791 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Because Evans was an expert witness, -853 (La.1990) is applicable: It is well settled that a court of appeal may not set aside a finding of fact by a trial court or a jury in the absence of "manifest error" or unless it is "clearly wrong," and where there is conflict in the testimony, reasonable evaluations of credibility and reasonable inferences of
Beaudoin v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co. 594 So. 2d 1049 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
Co., Sistler v. Liberty Mutual Ins.
Anmac Foundation v. St. Patrick Hosp. 594 So. 2d 951 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
Ellis v. Dover Elevator Co. 597 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
Fireman's Fund Insurance Co. v. New Orleans Public Service Inc. 590 So. 2d 839 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Hurst v. Eaton 588 So. 2d 1130 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Fanguy v. Dupre Bros. Const. Co., Inc. 588 So. 2d 1251 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
State v. Miller 587 So. 2d 125 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
Co., , rehearing denied, (La.1990); (La.App.
Veazey v. State Farm Mut. Auto Ins. 587 So. 2d 5 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
Galloway v. Baton Rouge General Hosp. 583 So. 2d 1169 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Morris v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. 582 So. 2d 1349 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
McLaughlin v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co. 582 So. 2d 203 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Home Insurance Co. v. National Tea Co. 577 So. 2d 65 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
State in Interest of J 582 So. 2d 269 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Breaux v. Van Vlett 578 So. 2d 223 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
LOUISIANA NAT. BANK v. Belello 577 So. 2d 1099 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
reiterated the standard of review this court must follow: It is well settled that a court of appeal may not set aside a finding of fact by a trial court or a jury in the absence of "manifest error" or unless it is "clearly wrong," and where there is conflict in the testimony, reasonable evaluations of
Blanchard v. Republic Insurance Group 576 So. 2d 1226 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1991
Co., as follows: It is well settled that a court of appeal may not set aside a finding of fact by a trial court or a jury in the absence of “manifest error” or unless it is “clearly wrong,” and where there is conflict in the testimony, reasonable evaluations of credibility and reasonable inferences of fact
Barnes v. Thames 578 So. 2d 1155 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Williams v. Stevenson, 558 So.2d at 1207 .
Audubon Exploration v. Linder Oil Co. 573 So. 2d 1180 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Co., as follows: It is well settled that a court of appeal may not set aside a finding of fact by a trial court or a jury in the absence of “manifest error” or unless it is “clearly wrong,” and where there is conflict in the testimony, reasonable evaluations of credibility and reasonable inferences of fact
Viviano v. Arceneaux 572 So. 2d 813 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Miller v. State 572 So. 2d 197 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
again speaking through Justice Dennis, the supreme court extended the appellate review of credibility questions to expert testimony when the court said "[t]he rule that questions of credibility are for the trier of fact applies to the evaluation of expert testimony, unless the stated reasons of the exp
Malone v. State, Dept. of Health & Human Resources 569 So. 2d 1098 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990