Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Monteville v. Terrebonne Par. Con. Gov't, 567 So. 2d 1097.

78 citing documents.

Tyler Bowman v. Devin M. Williams La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
Kerri Ulrich Versus City of Westwego La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2025
Gerald Thibodeaux, Jr. v. American Alternative Insurance Corporation, Munich Reinsurance America, Inc., Marty Bourg, and Terrebonne Parish Consolidated … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
Gerald Thibodeaux, Jr. v. American Alternative Insurance Corporation, Munich Reinsurance America, Inc., Marty Bourg, and Terrebonne Parish Consolidated … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
Ashley Nichole Major Bares and James Wesley Major v. Progressive Gulf Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2022
Robert Bailey v. State of Louisiana, Department of Culture, Recreation and Tourism La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
Bessie Tillman v. Nationwide Mutual Ins. Co La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
Joseph Glorioso on Behalf of His Minor Daughter, Molly Glorioso Versus The City of Kenner La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
Brenda Lewis v. City of Bastrop La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
Monteville v. Terrebonne Parish Consolidated Gov’t, (La.
Rosemary Grimsley v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, James Construction Group, LLC, and State of Louisiana La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
Doyle v. Lonesome Dev., Ltd. Liab. Co. 254 So. 3d 714 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Danielle Larson v. Xyz Insurance Company 226 So. 3d 412 La. 2017
Larson v. XYZ Insurance Co. 192 So. 3d 181 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Robertson v. St. John the Baptist Parish 177 So. 3d 785 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Monteville v. Terrebonne Parish Consolidated Gov’t, Abadie v. Markey, 97-684 9(La.App.
Christy L. Moore v. Rice-Land Lumber Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Moore v. Rice-Land Lumber Co. 150 So. 3d 657 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Fournerat v. Farm Bureau Insurance Co. 104 So. 3d 76 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Caskey v. Merrick Construction Co. 86 So. 3d 186 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
David O. Bordelon v. Gravity Drainage District No. 4 of Ward 3 of Calcasieu Parish La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Bordelon v. Gravity Drainage District No. 4 of Ward 3 of Calcasieu Parish 74 So. 3d 766 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Credit v. Richland Parish School Board 61 So. 3d 861 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
Bonnie Romero v. Clarendon America Insurance Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Romero v. CLARENDON AMERICA INS. CO. 54 So. 3d 789 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Gov’t., Cf. Joe, Inc. v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
Kuebel v. Department of Wildlife & Fisheries 14 So. 3d 20 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Banks v. Parish of Jefferson 990 So. 2d 26 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
Abadie v. Markey, 97-684 (La.App.
Jerry Ramos v. State of La, Thru the Dotd La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Ramos v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 977 So. 2d 1066 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Gov’t, , R1098 (La.1990).
Susan Arrington, Etc. v. Er Physicians Group, Apmc La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Arrington v. ER PHYSICIANS GROUP, APMC. 940 So. 2d 777 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Malone v. Shyne 937 So. 2d 343 La. 2006
Malone v. Shyne 936 So. 2d 1279 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
Calvin Rabalais and Merion Rabalais v. Lloyd A. Nash, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
In describing the principle of stricti juris, : The rule that statutes in derogation of a natural or common right are to be strictly interpreted is now generally recognized as being a corollary of the rule that statues in derogation of the common law are to be interpreted strictly.
Rabalais v. Nash 926 So. 2d 683 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
In describing the principle of stricti juris, : The rule that statutes in derogation of a natural or common right are to be strictly interpreted is now generally recognized as being a corollary of the rule that statutes in derogation of the common law are to be interpreted strictly.
Lambert v. State 912 So. 2d 426 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
Shelly Benoit v. City of Lake Charles La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Benoit v. City of Lake Charles 907 So. 2d 931 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Sevin v. Parish of Plaquemines 901 So. 2d 619 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
Ferrell Lavergne v. Quality Fabricators of Eunice, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Richard v. Hall 874 So. 2d 131 La. 2004
Gov't, (reh'g denied 1990).
Meritplan Insurance Co. v. DeSalvo 871 So. 2d 461 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Richard v. Hall 843 So. 2d 433 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Keelen v. State, Department of Culture, Recreation and Tourism
State v. Bedford 838 So. 2d 758 La. 2003
Gov't, State v. Antoine, 98-0369, p. 6 (La.App.
Bujol v. Entergy Services, Inc. 833 So. 2d 947 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Gov't , Ronald Adams Contractor, Inc. v. State, Dep't of Transp.
LeBlanc v. Hayes 827 So. 2d 611 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Abney v. Charity Hospital in New Orleans 787 So. 2d 1123 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Hosp., Monteville v. Terrebonne Parish Consolidated Gov’t, (and authorities cited therein)
Cooper v. Cooper 786 So. 2d 240 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
the supreme court explained the purpose of these provisions: The stated goal of the Recreational Use Statutes is "to encourage owners of land to make land and water area available to the public for recreational purposes by limiting their liability toward persons entering thereon for such purposes."
Domingue v. Stanley 784 So. 2d 844 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
Government, the supreme court held a landowner "who does not evidence an intent to permit the public to enter without charge for recreational use may not invoke the recreational use statute's protective benefits against liability."
Reed v. Employers Mutual Casualty Co. 741 So. 2d 1285 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
Ebarb v. Guinn Bros., Inc. 728 So. 2d 487 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
State v. Antoine 721 So. 2d 562 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998