Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Rosell v. Esco, 561 So. 2d 105.

56 citing documents.

Tommie's Novelty v. Velasco 923 So. 2d 936 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
ST. ANDREWS PLACE v. City of Shreveport 914 So. 2d 1203 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
Doe Ex Rel. Doe v. Desoto Parish School Bd. 907 So. 2d 275 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
See Landiak v. Richmond, XXXX-XXXX (La.03/24/05), ; writ denied
Vera R. Paine v. Avoyelles Council on Aging La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Paine v. Avoyelles Council on Aging 869 So. 2d 291 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Jake Dixon, Et Ux. v. Daniel Butane Gas Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
When the trial court’s findings are based on determinations regarding the credibility of witnesses, the manifest error—clearly wrong—standard mandates that we give those findings great deference.7 “[O]nly the factfinder can be aware of the 7 writ denied
Dixon v. Daniel Butane Gas Inc. 858 So. 2d 837 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Coleman v. Christian Home Health Care 786 So. 2d 819 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
Haacker v. City of Shreveport 781 So. 2d 701 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
Albert K. Newlin, Inc. v. Morris 782 So. 2d 1116 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
Pontiff v. Pecot & Associates Rehabilitation & Physical Therapy Services, Inc. 780 So. 2d 478 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
4 Cir.), writ denied, unit denied
Brumfield v. Coastal Cargo Co., Inc. 768 So. 2d 634 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
on remand, writ denied, (La.
Branan v. Allstate Insurance Co. 761 So. 2d 612 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Stobart v. State, Through D.O.T.D., writ denied, writ denied, Crews v. Babin, 98-931 (La.App.
Morris v. Players Lake Charles, Inc. 761 So. 2d 27 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
Ricaud v. Holloway Sportswear, Inc. 741 So. 2d 124 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
finding of fact in the absence of ‘manifest error’ or unless it is ‘clearly wrong,’ and where there is conflict in the testimony, reasonable evaluations of credibility and reasonable inferences of fact should not be disturbed upon review, even though the appellate court may feel that its own evaluations and inferences are as reasonable.” reh’g denied, (La.
Ortego v. Jurgelsky 732 So. 2d 683 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
Gibson v. State 731 So. 2d 379 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Gauthreaux v. Frank 718 So. 2d 985 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Tannehill v. Joguyro, Inc. 712 So. 2d 238 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
Desadier v. Safeway Ins. Co. 712 So. 2d 925 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
4 Cir.1990), writ denied
Satterly v. Louisiana Indem. Co. 704 So. 2d 882 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
Haynes v. Calcasieu Medical Transp., Inc. 702 So. 2d 1024 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
Viator v. Liverpool & London SS Protection and Indem. Ass'n 701 So. 2d 487 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
Guillory v. Ins. Co. of North America 692 So. 2d 1029 La. 1997
Succession of Pruitt 688 So. 2d 103 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
4 Cir.1990), writ denied cert, denied 93-933 (U.S.La., 2/22/94), 510 U.S. 1114 , 114 S.Ct.
Bowers v. Orleans Parish School Bd. 694 So. 2d 967 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
App. 4 Cir.1990) writ denied, cert.
Turner v. Cleveland Trust Co. 686 So. 2d 871 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
4th Cir.1990), writ denied, and Dominici v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., (La.App.
Shephard ex rel. Shephard v. Scheeler 674 So. 2d 1135 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
4 Cir.1990) writ denied cert denied — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct.
Davis v. Puryear 673 So. 2d 1298 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
7-5-94), -21 ; Stobart v. State, DOTD, Rosell *1303 v. ESCO, writ denied
Trentecosta v. Beck 677 So. 2d 1013 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
Gooden v. Canal Place Ltd. Partnership 671 So. 2d 950 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
4th Cir.1990), writ denied
Merritt v. Karcioglu 668 So. 2d 469 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
4 Cir.1990) writ denied cert.
First City Bank v. 740 Esplanade Avenue 665 So. 2d 1190 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
4 Cir.1990) writ denied cert.
RED RIVER WATERWAY COM'N v. Waddle 631 So. 2d 1266 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
on remand, 558 * writ denied, (La.
Arceneaux v. Howard 633 So. 2d 207 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
McFillen Rent-A-Car, Inc. v. Brierty 625 So. 2d 364 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Babers v. City of Shreveport 621 So. 2d 88 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
Jolly v. Otis Elevator Co. 620 So. 2d 497 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
Hernandez v. CONTINENTAL CASUALTY CAS. INS. CO. 615 So. 2d 484 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
writ denied, : It is well settled that a court of appeal may not set aside a trial court's or a jury's finding of fact in the absence of "manifest error" or unless it is "clearly wrong," and where there is conflict in testimony, reasonable evaluations of credibility and reasonable inferences of fact should not be disturbe
Haynes v. Lee White Wrecker Service 612 So. 2d 944 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
Cage v. Caruso 611 So. 2d 704 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
writ denied, : It is well settled that a court of appeal may not set aside a trial court's or a jury's finding of fact in the absence of "manifest error" or unless it is "clearly wrong," and where there is conflict in testimony, reasonable evaluations of credibility and reasonable inferences of fact should not be disturbe
LeBlanc v. Diamond Shamrock Refining & Marketing Co. 610 So. 2d 234 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
4 Cir.1990), writ denied, as follows: It is well settled that a court of appeal may not set aside a trial court’s or a jury’s finding of fact in the absence of “manifest error” or unless it is “clearly wrong,” and where there is conflict in the testimony, reasonable evaluations of credibility and reasonable inferences of fact should
Godeaux v. Rayne Branch Hospital 606 So. 2d 948 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Girard v. Price 606 So. 2d 990 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
4th Cir.1990), writ denied, (La.
Succession of Haydel 606 So. 2d 42 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
4th Cir. 1990); writ den.
Wainwright v. Moreno's, Inc. 602 So. 2d 734 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
at page 844 (La.1989), writ den., the Louisiana Supreme Court has enunciated the following general principles that govern an appellate court's power to reverse a trial court's factual finding: "It is well settled that a court of appeal may not set aside a trial court's or a jury's finding of fact in the absence of `manifest error' or unless
Williams v. Allstate Ins. Co. 599 So. 2d 478 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
4th Cir. 1990), writ denied
Hardy v. Delta Downs, Inc. 599 So. 2d 364 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
4th Cir.1990), writ denied, where there is conflict in the testimony, reasonable evaluations of credibility and reasonable inferences of fact should not be disturbed.
Warren v. Bergeron 599 So. 2d 369 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
Dugas v. Frederick 594 So. 2d 1372 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
4th Cir.1990), writ denied

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by