DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Hearty v. Harris, 574 So. 2d 1234.

69 citing documents.

  • Dennison v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. 645 So. 2d 1227 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
    the Louisiana Supreme Court addressed a similar issue in determining whether a self-insured rental car agency, which enters into a rental agreement insuring only the renter and one named additional driver against liability, was mandated to provide omnibus coverage insuring other persons using the vehicle wi
  • Breaux v. Claudel 640 So. 2d 744 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
    ’ ” “ , (La.1991), clearly distinguishes between a statutory ‘motor vehicle liability policy1 and a voluntary automobile liability policy.
  • Parker v. AMERICAN GUAR. & LIABILITY INS. 637 So. 2d 788 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
  • Edwards v. Automotive Cas. Ins. Co. 634 So. 2d 1278 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
  • Gunn v. Automotive Cas. Ins. Co. 614 So. 2d 154 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
  • Veillon v. Urban 614 So. 2d 238 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
    is dispositive of the issues in this case.
  • Bowens v. General Motors Corp. 608 So. 2d 999 La. 1992
  • Pitcher on Behalf of Pitcher v. Pitcher 607 So. 2d 838 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
    dealt with the exclusion of omnibus coverage by a self insurer, not an automobile liability insurer.
  • Raimer v. New England Ins. Co. 595 So. 2d 1218 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
    at 1241 (La.1991): "In Fields , the court correctly distinguished between a compulsory liability policy required under the LMVSRL by La.R.S.
  • Lindsey v. Colonial Lloyd's Ins. Co. 595 So. 2d 606 La. 1992
  • Lewis v. Narcisse 595 So. 2d 329 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
  • Mitchell v. Regional Transit Authority 608 So. 2d 201 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
  • McGill v. Winnins 593 So. 2d 896 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
    However, has held the restrictive language in automobile rental contracts enforceable: *897 Absent statutory regulations to the contrary, there would appear to be no basis for the lower courts’ disregard of the unambiguous restrictive language in the rental contracts.
  • Watson v. Sanders 583 So. 2d 151 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
    in which our Supreme Court held that the Louisiana Motor Vehicle Safety Responsibility Law does not require a self-insured to be responsible for the actions of persons using its vehicles and thus does not require the self-insured to provide omnibus coverage (defined as “insurance coverage [that] may be exte
  • Schroeder v. BOARD OF SUP'RS 577 So. 2d 1074 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
    the Louisiana Supreme Court questioned the continuing validity of Jones' treatment of the modification of the omnibus clause due to the amendment of La.R.S.
  • Overruled Quittem v. National Car Rental Systems 582 So. 2d 1337 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
  • Schroeder v. Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University 577 So. 2d 1074 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
    the Louisiana Supreme Court questioned the continuing validity of Jones’ treatment of the modification of the omnibus clause due to the amendment of La.R.S.
  • Putzeys v. Schreiber 576 So. 2d 563 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
  • Aisole v. Dean 574 So. 2d 1248 La. 1991